Jesterarts
Likes Dirt
It is weird, mainly because there is contradictory evidence.
There was no distress call or the like, which suggests a instant and violent catastrophic event.
However, in almost all instances of an aircraft breaking up at high altitude there is LOTS of debris scattered over a large area, debris that floats.
Since there is no or minimal debris, it indicates the aircraft was largely intact when it hit the water and then it's parts sank.
Based on the clear and ground oil slicks I would even go as far as suggesting the aircraft managed a water landing and then sank. However this would have allowed a good 20min of glide time to send out a distress call, etc PLUS there would be a potential for survivors.
There is again the option that the plane went down fast, stayed intact but on impact pretty much instantly sank. Though again, more floating debris would be expected and a mayday call.
RIP to those onboard either way.
There was no distress call or the like, which suggests a instant and violent catastrophic event.
However, in almost all instances of an aircraft breaking up at high altitude there is LOTS of debris scattered over a large area, debris that floats.
Since there is no or minimal debris, it indicates the aircraft was largely intact when it hit the water and then it's parts sank.
Based on the clear and ground oil slicks I would even go as far as suggesting the aircraft managed a water landing and then sank. However this would have allowed a good 20min of glide time to send out a distress call, etc PLUS there would be a potential for survivors.
There is again the option that the plane went down fast, stayed intact but on impact pretty much instantly sank. Though again, more floating debris would be expected and a mayday call.
RIP to those onboard either way.