The internet was abuzz all weekend with Shimano's XTR Di2 electronic shifting system for mountain biking becoming more of a reality. It has some bloody great features:
-Imagine running a cable through the entire frame, the bars, the stem and not have to worry about it being at an angle to hinder the shifting.
-It can be set so the guys running one or two chainrings can have the front drop to the lower ring / rings depending on what gear you grab on your cassette. Of course this can be customised and can be set to run manually. My understanding is it can also control the front and rear deraileurs on one shifter!
-The system battery can be stored on the bottle cage bolts, slipped inside a seatpost or just cable tied to anywhere where it integrates with the cabling of the system. Here's hoping it can go in a steerer and have a charging port made for easy access.
-The HUD can be placed on the bars, the stem or wherever you want it to be, that should reduce some clutter on your bars.
-It will likely have integration with Fox technology so you can change the fork and shock settings (ie CTD) and it will show on the HUD. That's tops!
-Word on the street is it may even have potential to be a GPS and could run maps etc on a big enough display.
I love the idea. Yeah, it'll be dear but it's more suited to the needs of mountain biking rather than road cycling. If frame manufacturers go with frames specifically designed to run Di2 then it may create some pretty fancy chances to change some traditional suspension travel lines. It may also make the design of a mountain bike frame entirely different to what we know.
My thoughts? I reckon other companies will be rushing prototypes to get in the market as this thing will and should take off. Two things bother me though; what the flipping hell would the system do if the battery expired and the cable tension was non existent? You'd be in the gear it went flat in? Surely a manual system will be implemented, thus making the entire system nothing more than a run of the mill current day shifting system? Why would we go for an electronic system when we still have rear deraileurs getting torn off and bent and making the whole show go arse up? Why not make gearbox technology before this system?
-Imagine running a cable through the entire frame, the bars, the stem and not have to worry about it being at an angle to hinder the shifting.
-It can be set so the guys running one or two chainrings can have the front drop to the lower ring / rings depending on what gear you grab on your cassette. Of course this can be customised and can be set to run manually. My understanding is it can also control the front and rear deraileurs on one shifter!
-The system battery can be stored on the bottle cage bolts, slipped inside a seatpost or just cable tied to anywhere where it integrates with the cabling of the system. Here's hoping it can go in a steerer and have a charging port made for easy access.
-The HUD can be placed on the bars, the stem or wherever you want it to be, that should reduce some clutter on your bars.
-It will likely have integration with Fox technology so you can change the fork and shock settings (ie CTD) and it will show on the HUD. That's tops!
-Word on the street is it may even have potential to be a GPS and could run maps etc on a big enough display.
I love the idea. Yeah, it'll be dear but it's more suited to the needs of mountain biking rather than road cycling. If frame manufacturers go with frames specifically designed to run Di2 then it may create some pretty fancy chances to change some traditional suspension travel lines. It may also make the design of a mountain bike frame entirely different to what we know.
My thoughts? I reckon other companies will be rushing prototypes to get in the market as this thing will and should take off. Two things bother me though; what the flipping hell would the system do if the battery expired and the cable tension was non existent? You'd be in the gear it went flat in? Surely a manual system will be implemented, thus making the entire system nothing more than a run of the mill current day shifting system? Why would we go for an electronic system when we still have rear deraileurs getting torn off and bent and making the whole show go arse up? Why not make gearbox technology before this system?