Your quote has a typo bringing out a contradiction...soSo you think someone who smoked a joint 2 weeks ago and is in no way impaired should be punished if they drive?
As I said individuals all experience different effects. The simple answer is zero...if you rocked up to work and supplied THC in a pee test, would you be allowed to operate the crane despite having been away from the bong for 2 weeks? Plus in our current legal situation consumption of marijuana is illegal. So having it in your system is a crime.So you think someone who smoked a joint 2 weeks ago and is impaired should be punished if they drive?
In which case a different means for measuring would be required and technology doesn't allow for that. In which case how would insurance companies and the sort know who to blame for accidents?So you think someone who smoked a joint 2 weeks ago and is in no way impaired shouldn't be punished if they drive?
Yep this is rife in mining communities. Pot can be ridiculously stubborn in the system even if it has no more effect physically, the trace hang in there for a while.A friend of mine in the forgotten years worked in a heavy industry where drug testing was common. While he would prefer pot over any other form of substance, it was his least used because of the lingering. By default he (and some associates) were "pushed" towards speed and pills etc because of how quickly they left the system. It wasn't a good long term scenario hut nobody wanted to loose their job.
Funny you should mention mining.Yep this is rife in mining communities. Pot can be ridiculously stubborn in the system even if it has no more effect physically, the trace hang in there for a while.
I have worked alongside people who get pretty baked on their time off but they are smart with their timing and the opiates/stimulants/psychedelics have been metabolised by the time they return to work. They will pass a drug test. If they declare using codeine and barbiturates prior to taking a drug test then they will be fine. Whilst what they choose to use during their time off work is ultimately their business, however, if they choose to drive stoned/tripping then they are indeed an idiot and should face the wrath of the law if caught.SNIP
A friend of mine in the forgotten years worked in a heavy industry where drug testing was common. While he would prefer pot over any other form of substance, it was his least used because of the lingering. By default he (and some associates) were "pushed" towards speed and pills etc because of how quickly they left the system. It wasn't a good long term scenario hut nobody wanted to loose their job.
And smoking some heroin will turn you into a total deviant like Bill Cosby, or worse, a Real Estate Agent!I saw the adds man! One slight whiff of pot will turn you into a sloth!
We all know real estate agents take cocaine. It is the Drug of choice for the rich and powerful.And smoking some heroin will turn you into a total deviant like Bill Cosby, or worse, a Real Estate Agent!
The issue I have with this is there is actually no prescribed content, unlike 0.05 BAC with alcohol. The THC test just shows there is THC in your system. it does not tell what percentage. It is either a yes, it is in your system, or no, it is not in your system..get caught driving with a blood THC higher then legally allowed after we enact legislation, same consequences.
effects are so massively varied that it'd be near impossible to work out a 'safe' level. given that it's also an illegal substance, 0 to me seems a reasonable level :dunno:The issue I have with this is there is actually no prescribed content, unlike 0.05 BAC with alcohol. The THC test just shows there is THC in your system. it does not tell what percentage. It is either a yes, it is in your system, or no, it is not in your system..
There needs to be a method to test what percentage just like blood alcohol content if they are to test for it.
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/roads...-prescription-medication-20151019-gkcfex.htmlThe issue I have with this is there is actually no prescribed content, unlike 0.05 BAC with alcohol. The THC test just shows there is THC in your system. it does not tell what percentage. It is either a yes, it is in your system, or no, it is not in your system..
There needs to be a method to test what percentage just like blood alcohol content if they are to test for it.
Take a holiday to California?I'm a stage 2 Pancreatic cancer survivor. Doctors declared that im now cancer free and i'm so glad to hear that. Since then marijuana products like this https://www.bonzaseeds.com/blog/bruce-banner/ has been a great help to me so i decided to grow my own marijuana for my personal use only. But growing marijuana requires more knowledge and need to understand its life cycle. I have encountered many different problems in growing myself but that doesn't help me stop from growing my own herbal medicine.
Bruce Banner...FFS...how dumb do you think people are.bruce-banner
Alcohol is different because it is a legal and socially acceptable drug. Therefore the law has to make allowance for there to be alcohol in your system.The issue I have with this is there is actually no prescribed content, unlike 0.05 BAC with alcohol. The THC test just shows there is THC in your system. it does not tell what percentage. It is either a yes, it is in your system, or no, it is not in your system..
There needs to be a method to test what percentage just like blood alcohol content if they are to test for it.
The ‘marijuana is a gateway drug’ argument is a complete misrepresentation of the facts. As you’ve stated, it is highly unlikely that someone who smokes dope is going to move onto heroin. At the same time it is highly likely that someone on heroin at some point smoked dope.I never saw any evidence that the weed smokers went onto heavier drugs, mostly they were happy to do what they were doing. Obviously not a huge sample but enough to make me feel that that argument is flawed.