fjohn860
Alice in diaperland
Who lists geometry in centimetres!?The trek website on mobile is cancer and I hate it.
Cool looking bike though.
Fucking Trek weirdos
Who lists geometry in centimetres!?The trek website on mobile is cancer and I hate it.
Cool looking bike though.
They're just acknowledging they can't measure it that accurately.Who lists geometry in centimetres!?
Fucking Trek weirdos
You are obviously not the Trek demographic that the site is designed for, to new.The trek website on mobile is cancer and I hate it.
Cool looking bike though.
It actually looks surprisingly versatile, even mixed wheel compatible which is cool in a short-travel bike IMO.
I quite like it, but the cost of them is silly.
Leaning into Downcountry pretty hard, can’t say this is remotely an XC bike
In 10 years the Supercaliber will be a DH bike.2015 was the end of the Superfly XC bike. 2016, the Top Fuel was the XC machine and the Fuel EX was the light trail at 120mm both ends, 2017 seen the Fuel EX get longer travel to 130mm and the Top Fuel remain as the XC bike until 2020 when the Supercaliber came in.
Even then, the Top Fuel with 115/120 still had a 68° HA and the Fuel EX had moved to 130/140.
In the last few years the Fuel EX went to 140/150 and the Top Fuel 120/130 or 140, with the Remedy range greatly reduced.
The Top Fuel since with 66° HA and up to 140mm fork is squarely in the light trail/DC cat.
Even the XC Supercaliber is up to 110mm fork and 67.5° HA.
There's pressure for "improvements" bigger is better, so a lot of manufacturers increase the travel to show that it's "better" than the old model. Eventually it has too much travel for its segment, so they have to create a new model to fill that void.
Everyone knows it's not the size that counts, it how you use it.There's pressure for "improvements" bigger is better, so a lot of manufacturers increase the travel to show that it's "better" than the old model. Eventually it has too much travel for its segment, so they have to create a new model to fill that void.
As long as your being told it with a heavy serving of disdain and disappointment it's all good.Everyone knows it's not the size that counts, it how you use it.
At least that's what I'm told on a regular basis.
Noticing that I'd be going down a frame size for a few bikes released this year - anyone else?New Ripmo and Ripley. I will have one of each - now how much is a kidney worth.
Ripmo - Ibis Cycles Inc.
The Ibis Cycles Ripmo isn't just a bike; it's a legend. With multiple "Best in Test" awards and years of high level competition at the notoriously brutal Enduro World Series, it’s the ultimate trail-slaying machine. How do you improve on that?www.ibiscycles.com
Ripley - Ibis Cycles Inc.
Meet the Ibis Cycles Ripley, your new best friend for every trail adventure. The award-winning bike has been updated with more travel and slacker geometry, making it even more capable and fun. It rivals the speed of an e-bike uphill while offering snappy, playful performance with 130mm of...www.ibiscycles.com
Yeah I'd be on a Large with those numbers. I like it, a lot.Noticing that I'd be going down a frame size for a few bikes released this year - anyone else?
The geo would still work pretty well IMO, but I'm surprised by the frame weight on the Ripley. Around 3kg without shock is pretty chonky for a carbon frame with small links. Ripmo I'd expected would've gone down the "moar stiffness because enduro-bro maxx-plus shreddit powerzzz" and weigh around what it does, but the Ripley? Hmmm...Feel like they lost it a bit with the Ripley. Too close to the Ripmo now in terms of weight, travel and geo.
Previous Ripley was such a fun bike on tight twisty old school single-track.
Maybe it's the frame storage strengthening that's lead to the extra weight?Frame storage is nice but the old pork chop bags actually worked pretty well IMO
I don't actually think it's "heavy" as such, but it's 500-800 grams heavier than several competitors for the same travel bracket. It just speaks to a cheapening off of either engineering or manufacturing IMO.If the Ripley wasn't so porky, it would have taken over the world
You are probably right but if it was a kilo lighter, it would be a different beast altogether.I don't actually think it's "heavy" as such, but it's 500-800 grams heavier than several competitors for the same travel bracket. It just speaks to a cheapening off of either engineering or manufacturing IMO.