Project Car / Motorbike thread. Let's see 'em.

A mate is into big soggy yank tanks and has a 76 (?) M1 Abrahms, or something. It is an ex west coast Canadian car and has been converted to rhd and renovated with a sunroom and deck. Well anything that big is a renovation rather than restoration. For a lot of years he has put up with a whistle from the driver's window where it meets the rear window. It is a weird design as there are no rails in the door for the glass to run in and adjusting the pitch and yaw of the window means adjusting the whole mechanism as it sits in the door. Something got loose a few weeks ago and the window slipped and was hitting bits it shouldn't. Anyway we stripped the trims and following the manual and free balling it managed to get it better but still there was a gap of 4mm at the top rear of the window. Doing a comparison of the near side it finally dawned on me that the windows were pillarless and the front window seals on a trim fixed to the rear window that just looks like a pillar. The fronts were pretty much the same position but the driver's side rear was too far inboard. Thus the gap we couldnt get rid of. We should have been adjusting the rear and not the front! Bugger. Wasted a few hours but actually an easy fix. And mate had put up with the noise for years! Off with the rear trim, adjust as per book and no more gap, no more whistle. Took 7 minutes.
 
I don't think it's the same car but it did a 9 second pass with the stock blower (12 Psi) on it and modifications to the heads and driveline.

They changed the blower to a harrop one and these were the results.

1738411140020.png

 
And road registered…
It depends on the engineer. Some are super strict and others don't seem to care. We had trouble with the esky because we redid the firewall. So many wouldn't touch it because it wasn't factory. No it is not. Just 100x stronger. Same with brakes. Guys wanted calculations which is fine and then find out they send to yet another guy because they don't understand it. All he wanted was peak fluid pressure which is the most ridiculous thing. Gave him contact pressures and retardation calcs, no don't need that. Strange, really strange. The qualifications for automotive engineer do NOT include 4 years at university and some years experience...
 
It depends on the engineer. Some are super strict and others don't seem to care. We had trouble with the esky because we redid the firewall. So many wouldn't touch it because it wasn't factory. No it is not. Just 100x stronger. Same with brakes. Guys wanted calculations which is fine and then find out they send to yet another guy because they don't understand it. All he wanted was peak fluid pressure which is the most ridiculous thing. Gave him contact pressures and retardation calcs, no don't need that. Strange, really strange. The qualifications for automotive engineer do NOT include 4 years at university and some years experience...
Would be nice to think that VK crash inspires some rejigging of the engineering/modifications certification system allowed on road used cars, but I’m sure it won’t.
 
Would be nice to think that VK crash inspires some rejigging of the engineering/modifications certification system allowed on road used cars, but I’m sure it won’t.
The rules up here allow for replacing say a 4.9L boat anchor (sorry cardy) with a 6.2L alloy version. Forget the kW. Then screw on the charger and life gets very interesting. No need for brake or suspension upgrades much less try and make the thing capable of the power it has been endowed with. When we worked on the esky it has all the Group 4 reinforcing plus some extra bits where we added the Watt's link etc.
 
The rules up here allow for replacing say a 4.9L boat anchor (sorry cardy) with a 6.2L alloy version. Forget the kW. Then screw on the charger and life gets very interesting. No need for brake or suspension upgrades much less try and make the thing capable of the power it has been endowed with. When we worked on the esky it has all the Group 4 reinforcing plus some extra bits where we added the Watt's link etc.
I’m having minor daydreams (fever dreams…) of rescuing a solid looking Rover P6 I know of that’s been languishing in an old blokes front yard for years and restoring it mechanically (it has a lovely patina on it I’d leave alone :) ) with an LS in made of the old Rpver 3.5 V8.

And a Jag lsd diff and brakes and suspension to suit etc etc….

But it would be the tame and stock standard LS - already more than enough for the Rover and unlike the VK it already has very decent road holding!
 
And road registered…
I wondered how legal the one that crashed was and had a look at the regs in Qld, the brakes from what I understand are meant to equal the car from which the motor came. The mass of the vehicle is based on the heaviest version of the model so VK Calais about 1350kg.

1738457179114.png

1738457389582.png
 
Last edited:
My 43 year old XS1100 that's nearly done. Rebuilt starter clutch, new lines, new bearings, battery and coils. Just need to rebuild the front brakes and she will be good to go. Weighs 1 ton but still pulls like a freight train.
 

Attachments

  • received_1771096143750057.jpeg
    received_1771096143750057.jpeg
    254.6 KB · Views: 31
  • received_2195284130927899.jpeg
    received_2195284130927899.jpeg
    303 KB · Views: 31
The rules up here allow for replacing say a 4.9L boat anchor (sorry cardy) with a 6.2L alloy version. Forget the kW. Then screw on the charger and life gets very interesting. No need for brake or suspension upgrades much less try and make the thing capable of the power it has been endowed with. When we worked on the esky it has all the Group 4 reinforcing plus some extra bits where we added the Watt's link etc.
It's been a while since I read the rules in QLD, I last did it when I wanted to whipple my VP, but it sort of says that strapping a supercharger on a Holden 304 is frowned upon.

But there is no definitive language - it's all may & recommended. To me that invites a creative interpretation of the rules. I'm sure with enough $ and persuasion an engineer will certify what I want. I've done the same thing as an engineer myself, with vaguely written procedures. My motto is do what I want until I'm told in no uncertain terms to stop.
 
And yet I'm not allowed to import a Laguna Coupe because it doesn't have enough KWs to be deemed an enthusiasts car... The rules need a massive kick up the arse.
 
I think the Queensland rules are good. They allow a lot more flexibility than other states. The Victorian modification rules are a dogs breakfast and unnecessarily restrictive IMO.

And at the end of the day, it's not the car that made a mistake. Doing dumb shit on the road has potential to win stupid prizes, even if you're in an 75hp FWD shitbox.
 
Kappa Watts? How many does it have?
The Lag Coupe I want uses the Nissan VQ engine in a fairly tame tune, not sure what but in a big heavy touring car the power to weight is below what the transport dept considers worthy of enthusiasts... Using power is a pretty dumb way of defining what is an "enthusiast" car...
 
I think the Queensland rules are good. They allow a lot more flexibility than other states. The Victorian modification rules are a dogs breakfast and unnecessarily restrictive IMO.

And at the end of the day, it's not the car that made a mistake. Doing dumb shit on the road has potential to win stupid prizes, even if you're in an 75hp FWD shitbox.
Its the inconsistency that shits me. High power and very sketchy shit like this is allowed, but modern safe cars that simply novel to the Oz market are not allowed... Bloody FCAI is only interested in their bottom line so made it impossible to import anything modern.
 
The whole industry is dodgy as fuck before this a transport officer for main roads on the gold coast was caught restamping engine and body numbers on exotic stolen cars and then transporting them to the UK.

Inspector jailed over car safety fraud


A Queensland Transport inspector has been sentenced to seven years jail over his role in a scam providing bogus safety certificates to car dealers.



A Queensland Transport inspector has been sentenced to seven years jail over his role in a scam providing bogus safety certificates to car dealers.
The District Court on Friday was told Edward Cornelius Moran, 48, of Bray Park in Brisbane's north, played a pivotal role in the elaborate scheme, which netted more than $123,000 through distributing 3,217 fake vehicle safety certificates.
Judge Gary Forno imposed a head sentence of seven years and set Moran's parole eligibility date for April 4, 2010.
A jury last month found Moran guilty of three counts of corruption and three counts of fraud for exploiting his position with Queensland Transport to help others involved in the scam between October 2002 to July 2003.
Moran was instrumental in helping his co-accused set up three Brisbane inspection stations and gain permits to issue safety certificates.
Judge Forno said a "serious feature" was the risk posed to motorists buying and using vehicles not genuinely deemed safe nor properly checked for defects.
He also said Moran's punishment was designed to deter "widespread corruption" seen in government departments in recent times.
"A significant aggravating feature in your case was that without the assistance of a person in your position with Queensland Transport, the criminal scheme simply would not operate," Judge Forno said.
Moran pocketed more than $45,000 from the scheme.
Meanwhile, Queensland Transport has forked out about $581,000 rectifying wrongdoing through its investigations of the fake certificates.
The scheme involved at least four other men who have already been prosecuted for their roles working from inspection stations in the Brisbane suburbs of Stafford, Springwood and Seventeen Mile Rocks.
Moran helped two of his fellow conspirators short-cut the system and gain permits to grant certificates.
Judge Forno said Moran's enthusiasm for the scam saw a third permit issued under the name of a dead man whose name he plucked from the death notices of a newspaper.
Judge Forno said while Moran was not the brainchild of the scheme, he "wholeheartedly" embraced it either due to greed or because he was disgruntled with his employer's perceived indifference while he suffered a back injury.
Prosecutor Glen Cash said it was "rather good luck than good management" no one had appeared to have been injured in a car crash due to unroadworthiness stemming from the scam.
Defence barrister Tony Entriken said prison would be difficult for his client because he suffered post-traumatic stress, resulting from his time as a paramedic with the Queensland Ambulance Service.
He also suffered type-two diabetes, sleep apnea and spinal damage.
Mr Entriken said Moran - a married man with three children - had strong family values, liked to "help others" and had greatly contributed to society.
He said his client felt "intense shame" as a result of his criminal activities that had ruined his good name and reputation.
 
It depends on the engineer. Some are super strict and others don't seem to care. We had trouble with the esky because we redid the firewall. So many wouldn't touch it because it wasn't factory. No it is not. Just 100x stronger. Same with brakes. Guys wanted calculations which is fine and then find out they send to yet another guy because they don't understand it. All he wanted was peak fluid pressure which is the most ridiculous thing. Gave him contact pressures and retardation calcs, no don't need that. Strange, really strange. The qualifications for automotive engineer do NOT include 4 years at university and some years experience...
I remember discussing brake upgrades with a so called engineer many years ago, old mate could hardly spell his name. He wasn’t interested in contact pressures, stopping distances etc. I did ask him a question about line pressures and piston diameters, he just looked bewildered. I left thinking what’s the point?
 
Back
Top