My guess is that he can't make the case for it right away. Like a snake in the grass, he's going to wait for the party to continue not turning around then strike a few months out from the election.How long before Dutton tries again?
Magic 8-ball says yes.**Dutton is Abbott's pawn in all this. ScoMo is a good result. Abbott's sister as member for Wentworth (assuming) will do no favours for Abbott. Lurch has more charisma and life than Dutton. As my local member I sent Dutton an email outlining my take on his fuckwittery.
Unfortunately (IMO) Shorten will win in a landslide and ScoMo will be seen as the cause. This may bring uncle Tony back from the abyss as Oppo leader. He did a fair job in that role last time. Who knows. Dutton is finished and first against the wall so he will be consigned to being just a sad part of history and poor home affairs minister.
Is it time to take up that job offer in Asia for 3 years?
It helps that the most popular and viable plan B for the Labor party is Albanese, who has created a bit of space for his own message without creating a big distraction.Bill Shorten is a turkey but I don't think he'll be stupid enough to believe that he won on his own rights, as Abbott did. If Shorten gets in I can see him lasting for more than one term, everything else being equal.
Listening to Chris Ulman’s commentary he said the whole 43 signatures, dutton legal advice, quitting/bi-election etc was a stalling ploy to buy enough time for the moderates to get organised. Julia running was about diluting Dutton’s numbers and the legal stuff was about creating enough doubt to swing votes.No fan of ScoMop but he's better than Sith Lord Dutton.
Still think it was a massive mistake for Bishop to run. Whilst I'd have prefered her over all other contenders I couldn't see her getting up and I think she was a relatively effective Foreign Minster.
I don't know a heap about the guy other than what I read/watch, and the words of a few folk who work in the capital and know some of his former & current staff.If Shorten gets in I can see him lasting for more than one term, everything else being equal.
Spill motion wasn’t a 45-40 FOR Dutton. It’s a 45-40 for NOT Mal. The only person who thought Dutton had a shot was Dutton.Duttons people need to go back to primary school to learn how to count. Major fcuk up on their part.
When you consider the spill 3 days prior was 48 to Turnbull, then 14 or so ministers resigned, and he still ended up with 40 saying they didn't want another spill .... it's fair to say the whole thing was a complete clusterfuck.Spill motion wasn’t a 45-40 FOR Dutton. It’s a 45-40 for NOT Mal.
That's not exactly true. Backward knob though he is, Abbott was PM by "proper" means, having held the Lib top spot since the Howard government was voted out, and Howard himself lost his seat.Warren Ensch made a fairly valid point:
"There hasn't been a prime minister since [Brandan Nelson] that has not come in without knifing their predecessor..."