I personally find this whole debate quite ironic, considering the apparent plans of Pro-cycle to close the Balfa factory and move production to their larger factories (no I don't know for sure, but it's been said on good authority).
Fat_Ride said:
If not, next frame you buy, without looking into production techniques, justify otherwise spending those extra 1000's of dollars on 'boutique' frames!!
"Image". You've mentioned you're an Industrial Designer so I'm going to assume that you would already be aware of the importance of image in this type of industry.
As for the workmanship argument, people who write off the Taiwanese shops are stupid, reminds me of the people who wouldn't believe that Japan could produce quality electrical goods; I mean who would buy a Japanese product these days? :roll:
I suggest you guys try searching the DM and NSMB forums for the write-ups on this very topic by Eric Fox of .243 racing. He explained in no uncertain terms why he chose to have his frames manufactured in Taiwan rather than on shore, and it wasn't just because of costs. The good welding shops in Taiwan are damn good, and will easily go head to head with those in other countries.
Having said that, there's good and there's bad everywhere; I know that there are a few flaws in the welds on my DMR frame, some excessive heat and a bit of pitting around the joins on some beads, but in reality it's far from enough to compromise the joint. I'll bet you can find flaws in the welds on some boutique frames too; if you try and tell me any person can lay a "perfect" weld day in day out, I'll laugh in your face.
If you want to ride something that is a work of art, then sure, pay the premium for a boutique frame, whether it be from a workshop in Canada, Germany or Asia; but as far as ride quality and durability goes, there's not a lot of real world difference; if a dodgy weld fails, you have every right to claim warranty, regardless of where's it from.