They barely weighed more than the 2.3’s...and it’s never planned as an XC bike despite the 105mm rear travel.
You’re cooked!
Incorrect. Well bonza like it is thanks. One star.Kinda feels like that guy who reviews someone's recipe by saying "I substituted the sugar for salt and I omitted the blueberries but it tasted terrible, 2/10".
Needs 29" setup, jus sayin'
Wot he said
On the plus side, it's nearly 29" effective diameter
But at least he's not running the dreaded 29" wheels!On the plus side, it's nearly 29" effective diameter
On the plus side, it's nearly 29" effective diameter
Substantially smaller still. But yes.
@Hipstar was trying to tell me there’s too much crossover with a spitty. For once he’s right. I’m really not noticing the reduced travel, but really noticing the improved pedaling.
. You'll get to run 2.3 tyres, it'll raise the BB and will properly complement the Spitty rather than overlap it!@moorey would be more likely to eat a juicy steak I reckon. He’s committed too far to the 29er hate wagon.This is the third time I'm saying this, but I really think you need to try it with 29" wheels
i've got some track cranks in 144bcd with a 48t ring lying round, #bigdog
I'll put my hands up to lend you some 29" wheels and tires
Lend him those XMC wheels and you may have a chanceI'll put my hands up to lend you some 29" wheels and tires
But I don't have any spare forks that'd work, unless a 120mm Fox 32 with a 155mm steerer would work
But they're boost, carbon AND 29"! I reckon Moorey would melt if he touched those. But I do have some non boost Stans Crests on Hope hubs that are lying around waiting for another project. Fast Maxxis XC tyres on them too
