Agreed. How the hell could you need your watch to tell you what month it is.Not a fan of the dodecagon with months and yet another hand but hey I don't wear a watch.
Year yes, month no thanks.Agreed. How the hell could you need your watch to tell you what month it is.
You have never obviously been a gamerAgreed. How the hell could you need your watch to tell you what month it is.
Or a drinkerYou have never obviously been a gamer
Yep, some of the prices make my bikes look sensible (still remember seeing a Cosmograph Daytona for sale in Singapore for a sneaky $120k). But personally it's what goes into them, the microcosm of having a nice accessory that also happens to be a crazy feat of engineering - which being the bike nerds we all secretly (or overtly) are makes for an easy crossover in appreciation.I’m not watch wearer so I shouldn’t even be commenting. And all can think when I look at the price of these is what a waste of good bike money. 10k for something that tells you the time and doesn’t even give you a blow job. Faaarkin hell.
It's not about the "need" for the function, it's all about the complications, the sheer engineering genius it takes to:Agreed. How the hell could you need your watch to tell you what month it is.
Post up options that can, seriously interested.I’m not watch wearer so I shouldn’t even be commenting. And all can think when I look at the price of these is what a waste of good bike money. 10k for something that tells you the time and doesn’t even give you a blow job. Faaarkin hell.
If there is something that nags you keep looking. I can ignore stuff that irks me when it is a small part of the whole but the visual appearance is the whole, you won't wear it.Thanks guys. Had some time to think. On reflection the Omega is a bit fussy, in person it looks better than in internet pics.
Leaning towards the IWC, however it bugs me slightly that the 12 and 6 are chomped off, I can't unsee that. The Omega bezel sort of screams Rolex, which might be out of place on an Omega?
At this point in life I'll get more use out of a watch than $10k worth of bike stuff. Might as well spend money on ourselves before our kids start costing us real money. Trying to convince my accountant that this could be a business expense haha.
No. On so many levels no.@Minlak ? He’d tell you the time AND blow you for a lot less than that!
Buy a Garmin watch and spend nothing on thousands of custom facesDidn't notice the 6 and 12 at first but now can't unsee it.
Buy a Samsung Galaxy watch, spend $5 on a custom face and spend the rest on bike stuff, win win
Get a sundial and keep @hifiandmtb and @ForkinGreat from killing another thread.Buy a Garmin watch and spend nothing on thousands of custom faces
also, if it's a Rolex or other wank brand, it's the "my watch cost more than your car" conspicuous consumption factor.It's not about the "need" for the function, it's all about the complications, the sheer engineering genius it takes to:
1) Design the function in the first place
B) Miniaturize it to fit in a case that fits on a wrist
3)Reduce friction loss to the point it is functional
4)Make these microscopic parts durable to the point they last centuries
5)Make the crazy functionality secondary to its breathtaking artistry of form
and
6) Do all of the above before the industrial revolution
There is a reason Rolex can sell a divers watch with a GMT function for $50k+ and still have multi year wait lists for it, and , let's be honest, a mind fuckingly annoying complication, minute repeater can command hundreds of thousands in an otherwise plain watch.
Nobody "needs" a watch any more, it's all about the fuck you, to physics.
it's a nice bridge...