Formerly Farkin.net - News | Forums
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 2017 Stumpjumper FSR Comp 650b

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    776

    Default 2017 Stumpjumper FSR Comp 650b

    Picked this up today, immediately took off the heavy stock tyres and threw a 2.35 Maxxis Forekaster on the front and a 2.2 Ardent Race on the back, dropped the stem down one spacer and took it up the bush.

    Pretty happy with it, though I can't work out why they routed everything except the rear brake line through the frame on the alloy bike.




  2. #2
    Clinically Inane
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    18,184

    Default

    Nice bike, your postie must be very happy?

    That external brake is pretty awkward too! Specialized have some interesting routes. I ran my rear brake external because I didn't want the hassle of oil spurting all about while trying to thread the line. Now that it's all done I wish I had ran it internal.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Cheers.

    My postie is always happy.

    IIRC the carbon bikes have the rear brake through the frame.

    Ally bike doesn't seem to feel any heavier than the carbon equivalent.....esp now the heavy stock tyres are off it. My wallet is however much heavier because of the alloy frame.

    Not sure about the dropper post, not sure I really have a use for it TBH.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    994

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by golden path View Post
    Cheers.

    My postie is always happy.

    IIRC the carbon bikes have the rear brake through the frame.

    Ally bike doesn't seem to feel any heavier than the carbon equivalent.....esp now the heavy stock tyres are off it. My wallet is however much heavier because of the alloy frame.

    Not sure about the dropper post, not sure I really have a use for it TBH.
    Did you do a weight comparison on the tyres? My stock 2016 stumpy tyres weren't that heavy, gripped a hell of a lot better than an ardent race too.

    Give the dropper a chance, once you're used to it you won't want to ride without it.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Just going off the stated weights, and numbers from other folks who've weighed them. Off the wheels, the Spec tyres are noticeably heavier and stiff in the carcass than the Maxxis ones.

  6. #6
    Senior Member sufferthesinglespeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Margaret River WA
    Posts
    241

    Default

    +1 for the previous poster. Dropper post is almost essential on a bike like this.
    Few rides in and you will never ride without it. IMO

    Also the stock Specialized tyres aren't too bad. I have never weighed or compared weights on bikes or components.(Engine room could shave many kilos)
    I rate their rubber pretty highly. But you're probably right that the OEM would be heavier than aftermarket and higher spec.
    Had a Maxxis tyre blow some threads in the casing recently. Blew a bulge in the sidewall which looked like the wheel was badly buckled. Still held air but was pretty well cactus. First time I've seen it but apparently it's happened to plenty.
    Couldn't fault the Maxxis up till that point.
    But have now put the spare Specialized on in its place.

    I like the new range from Specialized. Want to upgrade but recognise it's want rather than need.

    Bike looks clean, I like it. Even with the brake line running external.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Thanks mate.

    Just took it out for a quick 15km blat, with a fair bit of climbing thrown in. Very happy with how it climbs in all honesty. The tyre combo works great for me - you can tell how stiff the Spec tyres are - the folding ones that came off it are still standing straight up, like wire bead tyres, LOL.

    And in the past I've always found stiff tyres to feel sluggish and lacking in "zing", and I just don't need tyrepower of that magnitude.

  8. #8
    Senior Member wavike's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    428

    Default

    I've found (in the 26 versions anyway) Splesh good for rockier areas, bit thicker side walls, weights were a bit understated. Maxxis, run small and weights understated also. Botranger XR 3's nice and supple, grippy and spot on claimed weight.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    776

    Default

    It can be rocky as hell around here, lots of sharp axe heads, ice bergs etc.

    What I've found over the years is that it can be luck of the draw as to getting cut - I've ridden the same stuff without incident for 20 years ago, from back in the days of light 1.9's, and yet have seen a DH tyre cut on the same trails.

    I've gone the EXO versions of what I have - I agree that some Maxxis can run small, the Ignitor being a classic example.

    The Forekaster is a bee's dick small.



    Ardent Race, on the money.


  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Love this ! Looks mean in all Black !

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •