Right... I'm getting somewhere now
So high cadence training will allow my body to deal with lactate faster in an emergency situation? Eg, a hill or to attack an opponent.
And it will also increase your "power", the ability to maintain a high power out put for a while like on a TT bike, as the volume of blood going to your legs will have increased due to the high cadence training?
And here start the new questions...
How does all this cadence training on the road/TT bike help a mtber? as their cadence is varying all over the shot when in single track.
Their power output of a mtber also varies due to obstacles and pinch climbs ect. Do the power benefits of cadence training on a roadie come into play when mtbing, i the ability to 'push' harder on the pedals and get over tricky pinch climbs and step ups ect?
How would you use cadence in a mtb RACE situation? Lets look look at XCO format for the moment. Obviously in a road race, you could maintain a high cadence saving yourself for a sprint in the end? But how does it apply to mtb race, as the cadence and power is all over the place?
Thankyou
I have a few other insights that might help you out here.
Background: I am olympic athlete (coincidentally posting this to keep my mind off the world champs final tomorrow!) that uses cycling as cross training, so I am interested in how the body reacts to different training.
Firstly, and this is true of most activities, if you do a movement at with less effort and more often, you transfer the training load away from the muscles and into the cardio system more. This is known as central loading as opposed to peripheral loading. If you want to see another example jog up a steep hill and take small quick steps, and repeat trying to leap up in big strides.
Lactate happens when your muscles do not get enough oxygen to fuel your power output, in other words when you dont get enough blood flow (or lungs cant provide enough oxygen into this blood). Central loading will have the heart rate up for the same amount of work, but can be maintained for as long as your heart rate stays around the same area (heart rate drift - another topic) and blood sugars stay up. Peripheral loading will compound (ie once muscles are a little tired, the next effort will result in bigger cost, eventually you blow up!)
When you centrally load you stress your heart more. Like other muscles this will make your heart bigger and the walls thicker. This means that for each beat of your heart it can send more blood to your muscles, allowing
higher power for the same heart rate/ lactate level. This is the basic principle that underlies all aerobic training, trying to make your heart stronger. So high cadence sessions will definitely have benefit for MTB. It will allow you to do the same effort for longer.
Conversely working at
low cadence will put your muscles under strain for longer each pedal stroke. Time under strain is what
increases strength. So ultra low cadence max effort is what will allow you to
pull in the bigger gear. But this will generate high levels of lactate and fatigue muscles, so cannot be done for long periods effectively (do short intervals).
So to get faster overall you probably want to do both (on separate training sessions).
Other points to note:
Muscles are very specific in regards to training. If you train to move at one speed, you will get better moving faster or slower as well but not by much. If you want to be effective moving your legs (actual leg speed not bike speed) at say 20kmph then you dont want to spend all your time moving them at 10 or at 30.
Now applying this to MTB racing:
If you fatigue your central system, it will recover (at the speed your heart rate drops). If you fatigue your legs, they will take much much longer to regenerate.
MTB racing (whatever form) is a series of efforts (and recoveries during corners/descents). You want first and last efforts to be powerful (to enable nailing a climb / clearing a step up etc), so you want to keep the load more central (ie choosing a lighter gear at every stage eg vary cadence from 80-120 instead of 60-100).
Hopefully this has answered those questions (and raised yet more).