I am not convinced as to the scientific merits of this test, but I am not an engineer or know much about materials. But I know science.
Alloy vs carbon bars in this test, had a completely different profile, the flat aero bar cross section is completely different to the standard round alloy. Did they test alloy vs carbon or round vs aero bars?
The alloy bar was also fucked post test (?) it looked warped, so the alloy bar also 'broke', depending on how they defined broken.
I'm happy with the renthal carbon fatbars on the AM, DH and XC bikes. No one in the extended riding group has had problems with any brand carbon bars. But I run alloys on the DJ bike, I'm big and figured a frequently cartwheeling bike, alloy 'may' be more appropriate. I also run a heavy alloy bar on the CX bike, as I am not sure light weight carbon road bikes are great option for jumping, and my CX bike is rated to 15cm high drops - whoo! Also snapped the last road stem jumping water bars on a gravel road, so now I use MTB stems on the road and CS bikes...
The last bar I 'retired' was a 350g alloy RF atlas bar after some significantly deep gouges in the alloy, if a bar is going to brake, I'm not sure material matters.
Need a wealthy RB'er to buy all the bars and take them to a lab at a local uni and let the PhD candidates break shit, gouge and break them... Preferably someone who knows nothing of bikes, so they are blinded to brand names and expectation.