Knuckles
Lives under a bridge
absolutely nothing to do with the thread, did you make your user name, 'user name' or did you just forget to change it?
He obviously just assumed its a thread FOR dickheads to post random musings.
absolutely nothing to do with the thread, did you make your user name, 'user name' or did you just forget to change it?
He obviously just assumed its a thread FOR dickheads to post random musings.
Yes I chose my user name. no I don't have to type it in as the field is always auto-filed for me:biggrin1:
"random musings" I may be wrong but I thought my link was directly related to the topic? Perhaps you could give us some more ideas (random musings) of alternate uses for these tampons you describe?
Yep, dickheads. One day they will kill someone and it's a pity it won't be themselves. I don't ride a roadie so would not wear my GoPro, but if things like that would happen to me I'd certainly start doing so.
Yep.
Always dickheads driving stupidly that kill cyclist.
In Tassy the investigation into a car driver who killed a cyclist on a country road has finally been finished.
And the dude was following too closely to other cars and was following a truck (If I heard correctly) too closely, and went to over take, and bam, straight into the cyclist killing him at the scene..
Op; helmet cam would be more stable than a bar mounted one, or maybe a chest cam.
The other thing to remember is that minor accidents happen many times a day in small cities - just look at all the wrecks you see on trucks - change that accident to one including a cyclist and it's major and can easily be fatal at 40kmh. Cyclists die in a given accident disproportionally , as do motor cycle riders .
Dickheads shout things, throw bottles etc, normal motorists make mistakes.
I hardly call following too closely to vehicles to see the cyclist a mistake really.
I've got to say I'm a little miffed by this statement; driving in such a way such that you're not aware enough of your surroundings to avoid killing someone is not a mistake?
They couldn't see a cyclist because they were following too closely, they no doubt consciously knew what they were doing was dangerous, and continued to do it, it is not a mistake when they keep following too closely and are not aware of their surrounds..
I'm pretty sure that if the person has a conscience at all, they would describe the decision they made to follow to closely as a mistake.
Even if they had no conscience, but their acts landed them in prison, they'd probably still describe it as a mistake (even if they were only referring to that instance).
Being aware of what they were doing doesn't mean the decision to do that wasn't incorrect.
Killing someone because you don't know how to drive safely, is very serious and should never be brushed off as a mistake..
They consciously drove in a way that was dangerous.
What evidence is there that it is " brushed off"?
A fatal accident will end with a court case with serious potential consequences, courts hear all the evidence and make judgments based on the evidence
Second, what evidence is there that they were conscious of driving dangerously?
/Snip/
They consciously drove in a way that was dangerous.
What evidence is there that it is " brushed off"?
A fatal accident will end with a court case with serious potential consequences, courts hear all the evidence and make judgments based on the evidence
Excellent article, opened my eyes!Happened on a great article on how these accidents happen, and what the cyclist can do about it..
http://www.londoncyclist.co.uk/raf-pilot-teach-cyclists/
How vision works, and why you aren't seen
The danger of playing music - Our ears help us build up a picture of our surroundings
Excellent article, opened my eyes!
A must read if you ride on the road.
Good find.