outerlimits
Banned
What is more important, Fitness, Skill or a combination of the 2 ?
Soz.. general trail riding everything from xc to all mountain.For what?
Skill. Fit gumbys are still shit riders. Fat good riders are still good just suck at uphill.
I would say i'm 60% skill 40% fit, but i would much rather walk up a hill than walk down one...At the end of the day skill is going to get you down the hill faster (and safer, if anyone cares about that).
Sorta but not entirely. With all disciplines you do need some of both, in varying proportions, except maybe triathlon, where skill is apparently totally unnecessary, but let's not go there..... :tape: From a XC rider's perspective, this is probably the point where fitness vs skill is in the most equal balance, as being able to climb strongly and descend quickly and smoothly are equally important to being a fast rider, and as I suggested above, if you're lacking in fitness, as you tire it's the brain that fries, and when the brain fries the skills go out the window, and then it's in the trickier bits that you turn to shit, and you can lose more time there than by going slow on the climbs.Is this a general life question or a MTB one? IMHO skill trump fitness, but only to the extent where you still have the ability to ride up hills/mountains in order to enjoy riding down them. Who cares about climbing quickly - as long as you can get there with enough energy to manage your run down (the fun part). Obviously XC riders will have other views, but my argument is that if pure fitness-oriented riding is what floats your boat, then get a road bike. All those annoying rocks, roots, dirt and corners will just ruin your Strava times...
Nothing is stopping riders having MTB and road bikes and happily enjoying both disciplines. Fitness and skill: good together, but not always realised in the same arena. Personally I love riding up hills to get my descending fix, but only because I no longer have a road bike.
not really surprising, I've seen output figures from BMX racers that eclipse most disciplines.. but its horses for courses, to win at xc you have to be uber fit for the uphills.. races are "generally" not won and lost on the descents in that realm.There's actually a story that I've heard from 2 people I know that raced XC UCI world cup in the mid 90's. They ran a wattage test down at the institute of sport with all the sports gurus and decided to get the Downhillers on the test bikes. To their surprise they almost ripped them out of the floor mounts with higher readings than most of their top xc riders.
Bit of both, the girls love some skill but really dig a stayer. Lucky I have bothWhat is more important, Fitness, Skill or a combination of the 2 ?
So if you take XC as your 50:50 centre point, as you go for a greater focus on fitness you move to gravel, road and at the extreme triathlon, and the other way, with progressively more focus to skill over fitness you go toward the endooro & DH side of things.
Its a vicious cycle pf riding for fun, getting fitter, then riding more cause your fitter, having more fun etc etc.fitness is an added bonus to the best sport in the world.
That is why training sucks balls. Best way to ruin a fun sport is to start actually training for it.I always find fun to be the more important aspect. When it stops being fun those other factors dont mean shit.