MrCove
South Shore Distribution
what's velcro anus tape?"Velcro ans tape" are allowed............
does it help you stay in your seat? or is a little bit more "Newtown"?
what's velcro anus tape?"Velcro ans tape" are allowed............
Sorry for not being clear, it's a UCI rule. Which is why I'm surprised to see it implemented at a State Level.Is that a UCI or MTBA ruling?
I know there is a "default to UCI" clause in the tec regs but surely this is way over the top and damaging to the sport.
It was the MTBA Commissaires following rules handed down from the top - MTBA. Nothing to do with Rocky Trail or the event organisers at all.So who's idea was it to implement it into the 2nd round anyway? NSWMTB or Rocky Trail? Maybe whoever's idea it was should let the riders know exactly why they decided to implement it all of a sudden.
Sounds rather absurd to me. If we are going to regulate the crap out of State rounds as they've done at Nationals, people are going to stop attending these races.
Couldn't agree more.This is seriously ridiculous.
I didn't even know it was a rule until I had the UCI telling us not to let riders down with cameras on.MTBA enforced it at Oceanias because it was a UCI.
So, maybe I'm not real bright or something but if this headcam rule is an MTBA rule, then why is it only being brought in to NSW and does not apply to Vic?This all stemed from someone running that "helicopter" style setup helmet camera at a Wold Cup round.
Boys and girls, if you want to run helmet cams in your quals and race runs, come down to Vic, we just held the most amzing State champs!
I guess we have commissaires with common sense.So, maybe I'm not real bright or something but if this headcam rule is an MTBA rule, then why is it only being brought in to NSW and does not apply to Vic?
Just curious.
I didn't start this thread on hating, more of an understanding and to pass the knowledge onto others if it was official. To try and clear things up if you can confirm this; Because it was only a State event and not UCI or MTBA (national/Oceania) the decision is left up to the commissionaire, who obviously decided to rule on no use of helmet cameras in race runs.Lets be clear,
The helmet cam rule is strictly enforceable at UCI sanctioned events (Oceania's, most national rounds, national champs). This is the same with all UCI rules at these events, whether MTBA agree with them or not.
Ultimately a commissaire has the final say at an event; if he/she decides not to allow helmet cams that's their call.
I see the frustration and don't really agree with the rule, but it's beyond MTBA's control at the UCI events at least.
I didn't start this thread on hating, more of an understanding and to pass the knowledge onto others if it was official. To try and clear things up if you can confirm this; Because it was only a State event and not UCI or MTBA (national/Oceania) the decision is left up to the commissionaire, who obviously decided to rule on no use of helmet cameras in race runs.
Or because it is ONLY state level, were the organisers in the wrong and should we have been technically allowed to race with helmet cameras?
If you clear that last bit up Frenchie as you are on the inside and seem to have an official and current rule knowledge base. Cheers.
I'm hoping to get a crack at updating the regs soon so hopefully we can iron some of these inconsistencies out. Go easy on the MTBA hate- as a past hater myself now involved in the organisation, believe me we're all busting our guts for Aussie MTB.
Simon
Technical Director @ MTBA
So why is it being enforced at a State level event that has nothing to do with UCI?Lets be clear,
The helmet cam rule is strictly enforceable at UCI sanctioned events (Oceania's, most national rounds, national champs).
No, for a number of reasons.this is another odd rule, what happens if theres footage turn up of me racing on TV with out my permission, can I then go to the boardcaster and ask for a cut on what they made during the advertising while it was being shown?