Kinda annoyed me how he just threw his gloves on the ground for someone else to pick up.
Sure he might of been in the moment or something else but no reason to do that.
I don't think lacondeguy's run was a 95. Sure he hit allot of big stuff at speed and probably should have run but doesn't seem
like a few other got judged correctly. If zink hit the rest of the run he probably still would't have been in the 90's which is wierd.
Semenuk had as much speed and did allot more techy stuff. Oh well all comes down to the four people at the end of the day.
Yeah i found the judging crazy inconsistent. zinks run was not a 89.5. He hit one massive feature, hit a awesome line up top but that was it, he lost all flow, took the fire road to the bottom section where he didn't do anything spectacular. I think herbertson was also over scored. He did hit that canyon gap but I think his run was overall on par with fairclough and godziek around the 75 mark (first runs).
It really did seem like some riders were getting favored, particular I think zink in this case. his drop was awesome but it wasn't the 73ft drop just the 50ft (sounds weird saying just 50ft), yes ok he 360 but he didn't do much else and after that drop his run feel apart, no flow, broken run. How that scored that high I don't understand. I think he deserved best trick though.
I would have expected zink's 89 if he hit all his lines and didn't miss the middle sector. Without that I dont know how they saw that high a score. Fairclough should have scored higher or the same overall. Rampage is more than one trick. Zink put together half a run with one big trick. Ok maybe the other guys runs were more average compared to zink, but their lines were tight and dialed and they put it all together with flow and style. It should have at least averaged out to be equal or close to zink.
I don't know how a rider who nails thier run except misses the pedals on a back flip but doesn't crash, scores lower than someone who does half a run. :noidea: