Well, the two aren't mutually exclusive nor conflicting, but let me explain.
On the way home from work, literally around the corner, I slow down and...I nearly run into a cyclist. Thankfully he avoided me. I only saw him when he was right in front of my car and in the headlights. I mean I nearly drove straight into him - he must have been side on to me, and at an angle where his lights just weren't as clearly visible.
The street is very poorly lit (as typical of suburban streets), the cyclist is in a dark suit, no reflective gear, and only a small flashing white light in front and red light at the back (which is useless from the front).
He was naturally pissed off and showed it, took a photo of my car, threatened to report me to the police etc. I tried to explain (OK yelling out the window of a moving car at a cyclist is not effective!) that he wasn't visible but understandably he wasn't having a bar of it, so rather than get into a fight I just headed off home.
As a cyclist, I'm all for sharing the roads etc but at the end of the day, if we don't take extra precautions the cyclist will lose in any argument with a vehicle. The driver may get fined/lose a licence/go to jail...the cyclist could end up in a wheelchair for life or end up underground.
The last thing I would have wanted was to have run anyone over. I could have done a couple of things differently but he wasn't clearly visible and I made a bad call. If not for his reflexes, it would be a very different story now.
Just because the legal requirement is a headlight, it doesn't necessarily mean it is adequate and just because we as cyclists have a right to the road...it doesn't make it an equal outcome in an accident.
So please consider that when riding and stupid as it may look, a couple more lights and a dorky reflective jacket could save your life.
On the way home from work, literally around the corner, I slow down and...I nearly run into a cyclist. Thankfully he avoided me. I only saw him when he was right in front of my car and in the headlights. I mean I nearly drove straight into him - he must have been side on to me, and at an angle where his lights just weren't as clearly visible.
The street is very poorly lit (as typical of suburban streets), the cyclist is in a dark suit, no reflective gear, and only a small flashing white light in front and red light at the back (which is useless from the front).
He was naturally pissed off and showed it, took a photo of my car, threatened to report me to the police etc. I tried to explain (OK yelling out the window of a moving car at a cyclist is not effective!) that he wasn't visible but understandably he wasn't having a bar of it, so rather than get into a fight I just headed off home.
As a cyclist, I'm all for sharing the roads etc but at the end of the day, if we don't take extra precautions the cyclist will lose in any argument with a vehicle. The driver may get fined/lose a licence/go to jail...the cyclist could end up in a wheelchair for life or end up underground.
The last thing I would have wanted was to have run anyone over. I could have done a couple of things differently but he wasn't clearly visible and I made a bad call. If not for his reflexes, it would be a very different story now.
Just because the legal requirement is a headlight, it doesn't necessarily mean it is adequate and just because we as cyclists have a right to the road...it doesn't make it an equal outcome in an accident.
So please consider that when riding and stupid as it may look, a couple more lights and a dorky reflective jacket could save your life.