HamboCairns
Thanks for all the bananas
Despite having much more torque..The Ranger Raptors are actually very good off-road with their $10k of Fox shocks, the towing capacity and carrying capacity is shit though.
Despite having much more torque..The Ranger Raptors are actually very good off-road with their $10k of Fox shocks, the towing capacity and carrying capacity is shit though.
Burn it now!
Sent from my H8324 using Tapatalk
Or add a tray, toolboxes, grime, and dents?Burn it now!
I know a seasoned off-roader who has one now. Not a shill like that dude. He rates it.Do you think he's getting a free car and also paid?
Probably the best for it, yet it still manages to not look as munted as a SsangYong.... Close call though.Burn it now!
But I chose to purchase a lesser known car, and the price reflected that.....An Alfalfa on the other hand!
That’s some quality photoshop work
Sent from my H8324 using Tapatalk
Has nothing to do with torque - when you run the Fox suspension it’s tuned for fun off-roader not towing - so reduced towing capacity and too bouncy for the towing it can do.Despite having much more torque..
Don't pretend like you don't want to see fleets of these carting dirty tradespeople to job sites during the week and hoardes of unruly offspring to campsites on weekends.That’s some quality photoshop work
Your loss. They're junk. At least the one we had at work was until we ditched it.I know a seasoned off-roader who has one now. Not a shill like that dude. He rates it.
I couldn’t stand one. Makes my old 130 defender look pretty…..but I’d probably take one before numerous beige looking other new comers to the Ute market.
Don't encourage him!
Sent from my H8324 using Tapatalk
Maybe if you’d based it on an Alfa. The stelvio isn’t an Alfa, it’s an suv….Don't pretend like you don't want to see fleets of these carting dirty tradespeople to job sites during the week and hoardes of unruly offspring to campsites on weekends.
Sent from my H8324 using Tapatalk
I’m sure you’re right….I won’t be buying any of them I don’t imagine…there’s just some I’d sooner never buy.Your loss. They're junk. At least the one we had at work was until we ditched it.
There’s at at least ten questions I’d be asking about that situation.Don’t think we have a 4 X 4 thread so save starting something and lump it all in here.
I have a Dual Cab UTE and it came fitted with 18” wheels and a 16” spare. I don’t want the 18” wheels as you ah e to use 60 profile tyres on them - the spare is a 70 profile.
So I want to go back to a smaller rim and larger tyre - went to the tyre shop I always go to but feel his opinion of the 17” rim with 65 profile tyre was based on the fact he had 2 sets of 17” rims he could do a “deal” on for me as they had only been fitted once to a car when the owners decided they looked wrong on their car.
I don’t mind the rim but think his advice was based on selling me these rims not giving me best options.
So what do people think 17 with the 65 profile or 16 with the 70 profile ( I could probably go 75 profile if I went 16 too but would mean knew spare to match diameter.
Much better options that ATs now. I went to the new AT and the damn things went hard just like the old design at about half wear. Hankook Dynapro is what I would fit for more serious stuff, the Scorpian ATR Plus are good for tarmac, gravel and sand though useless in mud or nasty rocky stuff.I started typing a serious reply but Dales beat me to it.
More rubber = better. Extra cushion, better footprint for more grip at lower offroad pressure. Smooths out corrugations nicely.
What tyres you looking at? Ol’ BF all terrains are hard to beat, but I’ll be giving some mickey thompson alternatives a go when my cheap mud tyres wear out.