Bonnet
Likes Dirt
Watching the report on the wheels of justice ride on CH10 news last night (perth edition) i heard a call alledgedly made by cyclist that the speed limit on 'main arterial roads' be lessened to 50km/h.
i think this is useless, what effect does it have on us (commuting cyclist) what speed the passing traffic goes by at? 60kmh is not an unreasonable speed, in most cases passing speed is a mere 20kmh. i can run faster than that. it is a safe enough speed for both motorist and cyclist to negotiate each other. we have to be careful that brash statements like this aren't taken to be a serious consideration by the general public. imagine the outcry if all arterial roads were made 50kmh, considering that at the moment, in perth at least we have these roads at 70kmh.
accidents dont nessarcarily(sp) occur due to driver speed, for instance a customer came in with a trek 5000 (asian model) and had had a low speed crash at a mere 10-15kmh when a car entered a round about without giving way to the cyclist, he subsequently t-boned her and went over the bonnet. drivers fault, she had only moved into the round about, and was not going very fast either.
Of course in the interest of biker safety, it would be nice to see more bike lanes, instead of slower speed limits. if a truck on Leach hwy (70kmh, major truck route) goes past at 50kmh, its still a friggen big truck about 1 meter to my right, its going to have the same effect as if it were going by at 70, which is still bloody scary. however at 70kmh its all over a lot quicker.
just some food for thought i guess. driver education is ultimalety (as in most cases) the best solution, but when will the government pull its finger out and do somethign about it?
ASH
i think this is useless, what effect does it have on us (commuting cyclist) what speed the passing traffic goes by at? 60kmh is not an unreasonable speed, in most cases passing speed is a mere 20kmh. i can run faster than that. it is a safe enough speed for both motorist and cyclist to negotiate each other. we have to be careful that brash statements like this aren't taken to be a serious consideration by the general public. imagine the outcry if all arterial roads were made 50kmh, considering that at the moment, in perth at least we have these roads at 70kmh.
accidents dont nessarcarily(sp) occur due to driver speed, for instance a customer came in with a trek 5000 (asian model) and had had a low speed crash at a mere 10-15kmh when a car entered a round about without giving way to the cyclist, he subsequently t-boned her and went over the bonnet. drivers fault, she had only moved into the round about, and was not going very fast either.
Of course in the interest of biker safety, it would be nice to see more bike lanes, instead of slower speed limits. if a truck on Leach hwy (70kmh, major truck route) goes past at 50kmh, its still a friggen big truck about 1 meter to my right, its going to have the same effect as if it were going by at 70, which is still bloody scary. however at 70kmh its all over a lot quicker.
just some food for thought i guess. driver education is ultimalety (as in most cases) the best solution, but when will the government pull its finger out and do somethign about it?
ASH
Last edited: