Ohhh so THAT'S what I have to do to post up my worst photos! I've been WAITING for something like this to come along so I can show the world all the crap I don't want anyone to see!
http://www.alesserphotographerbook.com/a_lesser_photographer.pdf. Go and read chapter 7, and then please, please, grasp the idea that displaying your worst photos is doing absolutely nothing for you. At all. Your 16 year old friends might think they're awesome and make up those 25 likes you get on Facebook for an image, but that's really not an indication of anything except their incompetence and your low standards for yourself. Posting shit photos is doing nothing but ruining and commoditising photography.
Additionally, don't be so naive to think that just because Tumblr may not seem like a 'professional' platform that potential clients won't see it. Everything on the internet is seen by a potential client, friend, relative, or complete stranger...what makes you think your Tumblr is any more discreet than a website or regular blog?
Sweet, so now you've addressed points I didn't make in my response to Alex, go back and check out the original post I was replying to, and maybe have a read of my response again while you're at it:Taken from your blog..
" there are also a bunch of aspiring photographers who may never earn anything from it, and I don't think they should feel anything less than complete happiness that they get to take photos and capture memories. When I look through my website, nearly all the photos I see were taken on my own time. My favorites were taken with minimal gear and have never seen the inside of a magazine, brochure or commercial website. They were created out of love for photography, and when I took them I wasn't looking for a salable item. My favorite photographs are the ones I loved taking. And that, to me, is the definition of success."
What is wrong with Alex taking photo's that he [hopefully] loved to take and obviously likes?
I'm not saying that the work he posts there is his best (why is there even a 'best' photo - why not 'favourite?'), but like Oliver said, if he likes to take them, and likes the result, then what is the problem?
How can you argue for 'ruining and commoditising' photography? Who set the standard for photography for Alex to ruin? And what bar do you then set on all images you take? If you can't compete with someone like Ansel Adams then why bother at all?
As for commoditising - how is Alex creating a tumblr commoditising photography? I am assuming you mean the act of making a photo a commodity - something to trade in a marketplace. Clearly this is not what he is aiming for with his tumblr, so why use this argument? And then, is 'commoditising' photography really a new or bad thing? People have been selling photos for years, is that not 'commoditising' photography? Your website states that all your images are for sale and may not be taken or used without consent from you. That is turning the pictures that you have taken into a commodity.
And then you argue that he should be wary when posting images because of the potential that future clients may see them...? ironic?
(I am not arguing against your website or what you do with your photography, just the argument against Alex "commoditising and ruining" photograhy).
And Leitch, your argument is irrelevant. What Alex and you regard as nice are completely different things. I may look at images you post on your photostream as bland - perfect exposure, contrast - "controlled". Don't make insults where they are not necessary.
Anyway, at risk of getting drilled for underdeveloped, low contrast processing, here is an image that I loved taking of a tree that I loved to photograph. This is exactly how I want to remember this moment, from yesterday morning, Mary's peak, OR.
As you quite correctly quoted from my blog, I am all for people taking photos because they enjoy taking photos. That doesn't mean (and nowhere have I said) I think everyone should post their shit photos for the sake of it. I have hundreds of gigabytes of photos I loved taking, but in no way does that mean the rest of the world is going to somehow "feel" my enjoyment when they look at them and therefore think they're good photos. In the same way your underexposed photo of two trees on a hillside does absolutely nothing for me, no matter how much you loved taking it, and no matter how much good I try to see in it. Photography is all about you (the photographer), right up until the moment you decide to share the photo with a much broader audience, at which point it becomes about that audience...if you post a shit photo - I repeat, a shit photo - and think that because you enjoyed taking it, it becomes, or should be seen as, a good photo, you have much to learn. Why not write an amazing story painting a far more incredible picture of the whole scenario, rather than posting up a mediocre photo that does your experience no justice at all? Oh, that's right, because having a non-consequential Tumblr allows one the easy route to leaving ones nice little mark on the world! Yayyyy!Everyone should make one, I know some have cool proper blogs, but with tumblr you can post any shit you take. And not have to worry about potential clients viewing.
Luke,Tristian,
You have posted technically bad photo's on here before looking for feedback even though you knew there was major issues with them, now you seem to think you are a professional photography god who has the right to talk down to everyone who posts an image that you don't like.
Everyone has a different style and what appeals to you will not appeal to others. You need to realise that not everyone wants to make a business from taking photo's and be constructive instead of a jerk.
Peace,
Luke
Buy a couple of Cactus KF36's from Gadget Infinity. They're a bit bulky, but they're cheap, and for riding photography where there's a likely chance of them being knocked over/smashed they'll do the trick and won't cost a packet to replace. Grab a couple of Cactus V5 triggers to go with them and you'll be set. Should cost you about $250 all up for two flashes, two receivers and a trigger.Hey guys, interested in getting some remote flashes for mainly using for park/street shooting. Any suggestions? preferably as cheap as possible haha. To be used with a 550d.
I guess I got sidetracked with the whole 'shoot what and how you want' thing, it wasn't addressing the issue at hand. That was more a response to Leitch's remarks.Sweet, so now you've addressed points I didn't make in my response to Alex, go back and check out the original post I was replying to, and maybe have a read of my response again while you're at it:
As you quite correctly quoted from my blog, I am all for people taking photos because they enjoy taking photos. That doesn't mean (and nowhere have I said) I think everyone should post their shit photos for the sake of it. I have hundreds of gigabytes of photos I loved taking, but in no way does that mean the rest of the world is going to somehow "feel" my enjoyment when they look at them and therefore think they're good photos. In the same way your underexposed photo of two trees on a hillside does absolutely nothing for me, no matter how much you loved taking it, and no matter how much good I try to see in it. Photography is all about you (the photographer), right up until the moment you decide to share the photo with a much broader audience, at which point it becomes about that audience...if you post a shit photo - I repeat, a shit photo - and think that because you enjoyed taking it, it becomes, or should be seen as, a good photo, you have much to learn. Why not write an amazing story painting a far more incredible picture of the whole scenario, rather than posting up a mediocre photo that does your experience no justice at all? Oh, that's right, because having a non-consequential Tumblr allows one the easy route to leaving ones nice little mark on the world! Yayyyy!
Truthhey Tristan i think you might be showing your age? the word shit used in the way alex used it doesn't usually mean 'shit'
but you'd know that right?
Not sure how those would go in a standard camera bag? I always thought there wasn't a great deal that they could do outside of a case like your Pelican.~snip~
This is incorrect. It's not maths. Your photos represent one style of photography. But there are a reason why they're not on the wall of everyones house. There are no absolutes. You'd be a better photographer if you understood less about photography and more about people.Luke,
a good photo is a good photo in any language, as is a shit photo.
now now, no need to sound like a doucheLuke,
"Peace",
Tristan (It has no 'i'...)
On an almost irrelevant matter, came across one of these at uni the other day:Not sure how those would go in a standard camera bag? I always thought there wasn't a great deal that they could do outside of a case like your Pelican.
*shrugs*