Depends where you are purchasing your gear really. If you are looking a the price of new gear from an Australia retail store and comparing it to second hand gear from ebay/the internetz or people who originally bought their gear online, then you are going to save a significant amount of money going second hand.Used. If you can find what you want, definitely used, unless you're buying for work and want something like CPS.
Aside from little things like filters and triggers, I haven't bought anything new since my first camera.
Edit: and my 70-200 actually, but in hindsight I wish I got that used too, probably could have got the is version that way.
Maybe wait till you use one before you pass judgement, My MK2 24-70 is epic on my MK3. And my sigma 50mm is soft and unreliable.. I hate it how you can pay for professional gear only to receive a mediocre copy. I hope i haven't misunderstood your comment and you're refereeing to the MK1 lol.I owned the 24-70 for about 12 months. I've also used a few of them. Excluding the recently released 24-70 mk2, as I've not used one yet, every copy Ive seen has serious CA issues, is soft (compared with many other lenses - zooms included), is heavy and just boring to use. for the price of a 24-70 mk2 you could have several primes that would do the job better.
Which one? :decision:;-)Dammit, just buy a Nikon.
Was referring to the mk1. Haven't used the new one yet! Have heard good things, however. I find the lens boring though (personal opinion) and prefer to use primes.Maybe wait till you use one before you pass judgement, My MK2 24-70 is epic on my MK3. And my sigma 50mm is soft and unreliable.. I hate it how you can pay for professional gear only to receive a mediocre copy. I hope i haven't misunderstood your comment and you're refereeing to the MK1 lol.
I wasn't really keen on the idea of one till i bought one, but now love every aspect of it.
D600, duh.Which one? :decision:;-)
Yeah, but you're comparing the cheapest new prices to ebay second hand, which is usually far from the cheapest. The product in question is also a bit of an exception as from what I've seen there's bugger all of them on the used market anyway. If you're buying new from HK you'll likely be dealing with international warranty support too, so I'd wonder if it's that much of an advantage over second hand. If you needed something fixed in a hurry your best option is likely to be paying for a local repair, so there's no advantage there, and it still wouldn't help with eligibility for the pro-support schemes or anything.Depends where you are purchasing your gear really. If you are looking a the price of new gear from an Australia retail store and comparing it to second hand gear from ebay/the internetz or people who originally bought their gear online, then you are going to save a significant amount of money going second hand.
However, if you are open to buying new from Hong Kong, you are hardly going to save anything going second hand. For this reason I've bought every bit of camera equipment I own brand new. There have been countless examples I've come across in the past, but just looking on ebay now you can pick up a 5D Mark 3 new for around $3080, and there is a second hand one up there which is up to $2850. No brainer for me.
It's a fantastically versatile lens, sure, but I know my copy is a little on the soft side most of the time.not sure what you gripe with the 24-70 is either, fantastic lens.
(Good) lenses will typically stick around a little longer than the camera bodies they're mounted to but eventually they to will be updated/superseded. This is particularly evident as camera manufacturers once again push for higher resolution cameras which make optical flaws in your otherwise perfect lens painfully obvious (as the D800 did on my bag of older Nikkor AF lenses...)Great camera bodies come and go but great glass will last you a lifetime.
:thumb:Hey, Nikon owners are a proud people haha
I didn't realise how bigger deal this would be when I got one, and also how shit my technique was to boot, and I was shooting with a 21mp camera before it! I don't think I would have sent my 14-24 back to Nikon for warranty if everything wasn't so damn critical, whatever they did made all the difference though...(Good) lenses will typically stick around a little longer than the camera bodies they're mounted to but eventually they to will be updated/superseded. This is particularly evident as camera manufacturers once again push for higher resolution cameras which make optical flaws in your otherwise perfect lens painfully obvious (as the D800 did on my bag of older Nikkor AF lenses... / [/URL]
*shrugs*
Well I guess I'll just continue being underwhelmed by it on my pre-micro body.Just for anyone that has a 24 - 70 and is underwhelmed by it, I really found mine exceptionally dissapointing for the first while of owning it, but I put an hour + into a micro adjust one day (only ended up being +3) and it's a completely different lens now...
You're not missing much haha.Well I guess I'll just continue being underwhelmed by it on my pre-micro body.