thecat
NSWMTB, Central Tableland MBC
There are theories and Sir Rodger Penrose claims concentric cycles detected in the back ground microwave radiation by NASA's WMAP satellite points to cyclic cosmology rather than the more accepted inflationary model typically suggested in the big bang theory.Agnostic here. How long will it take science to find out what happened before the Big Bang?
Let's face it, science can explain a lot in the observable universe, but how are we supposed to conceive, let alone measure and find evidence of how something was created from nothing?
http://www.newton.cam.ac.uk/webseminars/pg+ws/2005/gmr/gmrw04/1107/penrose/
The reason why the question of before the big bang isn't really addressed that often is because it's kind of meaningless.
Understanding what happened an instant after the bang is important to understanding exactly what is happening now, how the building blocks of our universe were formed and how it all interacts.
Understanding what happened before the big bang has no bearing on our understanding of the current Universe because at the bang all the rules and data were reset. It's kinda like the universe did a "Format C" on itself
It would be like studying a cow to understand a chocolate milk shake. Or studying a slide rule to try and understand an i Phone
Knowledge for knowledge sake is good but hard to get funding for.
As for understanding, conceiving and measuring how something can be made from nothing it seems to be a fundamental feature of our universe and there is in fact plenty of evidence for it. Subatomic particles pop in and out of existence all the time in such numbers that the energy given off by their collisions is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate
Last edited: