I just had a read of the regulations on the UCI site, and he might be in more trouble than what is reported in the story. If they consider the Belgian authority who tested him an anti-doping agency (whether registerd, authorised, or not), then testing positive leaves him open to UCI sanction. He has signed the operation Puerto commitment, so that would be the loss of his earnings from the last two years as well as whatever bans would apply.That's f***ed. If he had green hair, could they ban him because it was bad for the Tour image?
If they can't prove Cocain has any effect on his performance it's not their concern IMO. How dare they pass judgement on someone for what they choose to do. Could anyone enlighten me as to why they should give a damn? Are only pure white lab rats allowed? Sure he's a fool for not taking it more seriously, it's not like he couldn't have waited till after his competitve carer to party. But that's still a gross invasion of his privacy.
That's f***ed. If he had green hair, could they ban him because it was bad for the Tour image?
If they can't prove Cocain has any effect on his performance it's not their concern IMO. How dare they pass judgement on someone for what they choose to do. Could anyone enlighten me as to why they should give a damn? Are only pure white lab rats allowed? Sure he's a fool for not taking it more seriously, it's not like he couldn't have waited till after his competitve carer to party. But that's still a gross invasion of his privacy.
Think outside your own opinions. you always harp on about the man ruining utopia, but part of having conviction in your opinions is in having an insight and compassion towards others.That's f***ed. If he had green hair, could they ban him because it was bad for the Tour image?
If they can't prove Cocain has any effect on his performance it's not their concern IMO. How dare they pass judgement on someone for what they choose to do. Could anyone enlighten me as to why they should give a damn? Are only pure white lab rats allowed? Sure he's a fool for not taking it more seriously, it's not like he couldn't have waited till after his competitve carer to party. But that's still a gross invasion of his privacy.
I don't do drugs, I am having compassion towards others. leave people to do what they want, simple. If they're competing,then sure, make it fair. I don't think people should be allowed to use Coke or any drug when competing, and I don't see how it would help anyone training.Think outside your own opinions. you always harp on about the man ruining utopia, but part of having conviction in your opinions is in having an insight and compassion towards others.
What I was trying to say.A lot of people in the world find drug use to be heinous, any form. Personally i have no strong feelings for or against drug use, i have no objections to what people do in their private lives as long it doesn't affect society detrimentally, and i also feel that the current views and legislations held in the english speaking world are close minded and draconian when it comes to dealing with drugs. but back to the point.
Corprate control of our freedoms? F*** that, fight the powerThe tour is a marketing tool, and there are very few companies that are interested in having their product directly, or indirectly linked to such a social stigma. Its as simple as that.
Yeah,not fair to use while competing.furthermore, its not called marching powder for nothing.. cocaine IS a drug that should be considered to affect a persons performance. especially in an endurance event
Oh snap! Haha.Puts a new twist on the idea of a gram counting roadie!