I have to agree with Ivan, you say you are intermediate, which does involve plenty of stacking especially on a DH bike. I am not familiar with YT's policies and whether they have a crash replacement scheme but I do know of the heart ache of a flaccid Carbon frame. It is not good by the way.Its $900 difference to save 1kg.
IMO, Aluminium is a safer bet for DH racing, as you DH bikes get crashed quite a bit.
I have a few dents in my glory that I wonder about in terms of wether they would have made a carbon crack. Does aly dent = carbon crack? 1kg is a heap though!!I have to agree with Ivan, you say you are intermediate, which does involve plenty of stacking especially on a DH bike. I am not familiar with YT's policies and whether they have a crash replacement scheme but I do know of the heart ache of a flaccid Carbon frame. It is not good by the way.
pretty sure that is a picture of an aluminium model, just going off whats on the website re 'colourways'...... still nice looking though!Surely you'd go the carbon if you can afford the extra $$$. Here's a pic of carbon I took at CW Rotorua........just sexy.
Went mushy for me. Yeah is a bit of weight, that $900 saved though could go towards getting it lighter, which is easy. If you are shuttling with the odd push run it is no concern. More gravitational potential and greater momentum though, more is better right?I have a few dents in my glory that I wonder about in terms of wether they would have made a carbon crack. Does aly dent = carbon crack? 1kg is a heap though!!
Depends how quickly you like to stop or change direction, more weight at the same speed means more interia, which equals a greater resistance to change, slowing or direction. But i don't race and I find the heavier bike holds a better line through the rough stuff, where as the lighter bike whilst more responsive tends to bounce around a lot more.More gravitational potential and greater momentum though, more is better right?