very good pictures.:juggle:I also just got a Pentax film SLR, with 2 lenses (25-80, 75-300) & am looking to try & improve my photography skills a bit, so this thread is handy.
Here are a couple of pics from my first roll of film:
Since he already has mine, that might be easiest :dance:Happy to provide my email address to assist in helping to critic!
****Quietly sits back with drink waiting for Angus's answer to this question.****Forgot about this place! I have an exam tomorrow, which is probably why I remembered it now...
I was planning to travel but things keep falling through so now I'm looking to (finally) update my gear. Considering a Nikon D600 with a 24-70. The D800 is tasty but an overkill for what I need, and the 24-70 seems like a beautiful workhorse while I save for some primes.
Anyone have any experience or opinions on the D600 and lens suggestions?
And lastly, if you see any good deals (more than happy to buy second-hand) let me know!
Will post up some shots soon.
**Uses Jedi Mind Trick**Since he already has mine, that might be easiest :dance:
While there is nothing wrong with a 24-70, having owned one and now moved to primes, I'd say you're better off getting primes first - even cheaper ones.Forgot about this place! I have an exam tomorrow, which is probably why I remembered it now...
I was planning to travel but things keep falling through so now I'm looking to (finally) update my gear. Considering a Nikon D600 with a 24-70. The D800 is tasty but an overkill for what I need, and the 24-70 seems like a beautiful workhorse while I save for some primes.
Anyone have any experience or opinions on the D600 and lens suggestions? If something pops up and I can't stretch my budget to the 24-70 what else would you suggest?
And lastly, if you see any good deals (more than happy to buy second-hand) let me know!
Will post up some shots soon.
Callan, I know the added benefits to prime lenses, but if someone wants a "work horse", those benefits go out the window don't they? **genuine question**While there is nothing wrong with a 24-70, having owned one and now moved to primes, I'd say you're better off getting primes first - even cheaper ones.
How much is a nikon 2470? like $2k? for $2k you could get a sigma 35 (900), sigma 50 (400) and a sigma 85 (750 ish). The lenses absolutely kill the 24-70. One thing I noticed when using the 24-70 is that I almost always favoured 24, 35, 50 or 70mm. Why not just get primes?
SRSLY. Life is better at 1.4.
Also I hear the d600 is excellent.
Because in the time it takes you to find the 24 in your bag, remove the 50, fit the 24 and stash the 50 somewhere, you might have missed the shot. That, and you've been carrying four times as many lenses.One thing I noticed when using the 24-70 is that I almost always favoured 24, 35, 50 or 70mm. Why not just get primes?
To be honest, if you had asked me when I owned the 24-70, id agree. But now I couldn't disagree more.Because in the time it takes you to find the 24 in your bag, remove the 50, fit the 24 and stash the 50 somewhere, you might have missed the shot. That, and you've been carrying four times as many lenses.
*disclaimer* Only on a few of their latest lenses.however Sigma does have a bit of an edge over Canon with the sharpness.
*arguably**disclaimer* Only on a few of their latest lenses.
Thanks.Thanks Craig! Awesome shot.
Out of interest, do you know her, hired her for the shoot or TF?
Cheers
Hux
This is my problem right here, I don't know any smokin hot girls that would pose like that for me! LolThanks.
I know her. Great girl to work with too.