Gutty said:
Socket said:
wombat said:
I think you'll find the front end in F1 cars are actually a parallelogram (double wishbone isn't it?).
Cook: I know I've asked this before, but I couldn't find the thread....are you Thomas Cook?
If it is a parallelogram, it has a lot of dissimilarities (is that a word) with the Lawwill linkage.
And what are these dis similarities then, oh so great one ? Obviously they must be different in many ways, one is on a car and has the wheel at 90 degrees and the other is on a MTB whith the wheel straight. I never said they were "exactly" the same did i ?!
They are both semi parrallelograms, obviously the diamensions and shock placement are very different(The F1 uses a linkage also) but the basic design is very similar.
You don't take it all too serious at all do ya mate ?!?! Geez...........
What I was talking about is that a lot of Lawwill designs (maybe even all, I don't know) use a floating brake (eg Chris's Yeti) because the IC is pretty close to the axle. Lawwills also have a (slightly) different axle path to a parallelogram linkage; it's supposed to be vertical but it's not, whereas a parallelogram linkage will have a circular axle path. A parallelogram linkage doesn't have any IC, so it won't suffer torque-induced movement. On a car (this is some VERY basic theorising here cos I don't know shit about cars) I imagine you could use a Lawwill-type linkage to reduce squatting around corners (or you could use a linkage to do the opposite, and increase the squatting). I don't know what a car designer needs to design it to do though, it seems to me that having the suspension try to extend at the outer wheels, and compress at the inner wheels around corners would be advantageous, but I honestly don't know.
And what is a semi-parallelogram? :?
Yes, I do take it too seriously