Brilliant!
In other news, this thread alone is proof that workmx is wrong and PoSM is right. Anyone trying to argue with religion has already lost the argument by virtue of the fact that they've lent it some perceived legitimacy by recognising it as being worthy of argument. Our species will not progress through constant debate over the incredibly f**king obvious - you wouldn't argue with a kid who told you he had an imaginary friend, you'd just treat him like he was retarded, which he clearly is. The same goes for religion - the correct approach to actually educating the world is NOT to argue with morons, it is to treat their contentions with the same kind of violently condescending derision you'd bestow upon any other equally ridiculous concept. Giving any kind of obviously stupid concept enough time to even bother arguing with it is LOSING THE ARGUMENT - not to mention pissing people off. Implicit social pressure is what propagates religious belief, and implicit social pressure is equally capable of disrupting religious belief en masse.
So if you care in the slightest about "atheism" and its importance, move on, let the human race evolve, treat tards like tards, and in time the religious will be viewed with the same mix of pity and disgust as people wearing Unit wifebeaters.