Lemontime
Eats Squid
Okay should we say excessive then? Much easier.i PERSONALLY would not spend $200 on a shirt, but that's not to say it's STUPID to spend $200.
Okay should we say excessive then? Much easier.i PERSONALLY would not spend $200 on a shirt, but that's not to say it's STUPID to spend $200.
Excessive, sure, i guess you could call it excessive to people who are not familiar with it.Okay should we say excessive then? Much easier.
good answerwell, a consumer........
The customer is always rightwell, a consumer........
Yeah you pay for a brand in a sense, you pay for a brand no matter what product you are buying, it's just a fact of the industry, I fail to see how people claim they 'don't pay for brands', because it's bullshit.i think when paying $200 for a shirt the quality would be good, but what your really paying for is the brand, as its "stylish". a T-shirt is probably made somewhere in asia for around 5 dollars, but then hyped up so much as to be the "best look" or whatever, that they bullshit their way into making $200 dollars out of something thats worth less than a tenth of that. i think people get sucked in to these sorts of things and it sucks to be them....
I never said that. My only point was that a cheap Tee and an expensive one are functionally the same - and if you do pay a lot for one, you are solely paying for whatever's on it. If you're gonna argue that paying a shirtload for clothes gets you better quality, start arguing about jeans or suits or something that the person charging exorbitant amounts actually puts together.As Arete says- paying $200 for something that probably cost far less than a quarter of that to make is insane.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X_Ot0k4XJcpaying a shirtload
Lol'dNo, it isn't, at all. Quality is quite obviously defined by well, quality. However, quality, in most of the instances does cost $$.
i PERSONALLY would not spend $200 on a shirt, but that's not to say it's STUPID to spend $200. If someone really has an appreciation for the way they look, fashion, and apparel in general, it is not at all stupid for them to spend $200 on a shirt. Who are you, to define when spending (X) amount of money on something you don't agree with is stupid?
You know what else is insane? People who pay $800 for a frame that costs probably $200 to make, if that. People pay so, so, SO much mark up on products day in day out, it simply is impossible to use the "well, it didn't cost them much" line. And in reality, that $200 shirt PROBABLY does cost fuck all for them to make, but at the same time would cost more than your ordinary t-shirt, generally when/if a shirt gets this high in price they are a completely custom manufactured garment. Again, i have not actually seen a shirt this expensive, nor would I spend that money (i'd spend $50-$70), but I certainly do not see it as stupid.
I agree with the "if i see something amazing, fantastic, the best thing ever" i will buy it and not worry about the price it could be $20 from Target or it could be a $200 tailored Hugo boss, Armani etc shirt.Are you joking, man? Is good clothing really defined by the price tag? If I see something amazing, fantastic, the best thing ever- of course I want it. But how can someone honestly justify blowing upwards of $200 on a shirt? It's a shirt, and $200 could go to something so much better. If you're honestly living so far up your own ass that you can't see the stupidity in blowing $200 on a freaking t-shirt, then I'm legitimately worried.
As Arete says- paying $200 for something that probably cost far less than a quarter of that to make is insane.
...They joys of being 24 with a disposable income.
lil bow wow, is that you? We got coffe black saying everyone who thinks $50 is too much for a T shops at target and you telling us all how much money you make. It's got nothing to do with how much I COULD spend on a Tee-shirt.own house, we own our cars have large investments both have well established fairly well paying jobs.