So.. How much trust should I put into what Ken Rockwell says?
He has compiled a very useful database however it is written with a very specific audience in mind. As soon you start combining science, opinion and egotism without clearly marking out which is which, you lose all credibility, hence his reputation as being a bit of a joke.
I'm just getting thoroughly annoyed that Nikon is refusing to put out a replacement to the D700. I'm looking forward to a Nikon that can compete in all aspects to the 5DmkII. -_-
I share your frustration however I disagree with your later statement; both cameras are deficient to some degree.
The D700 is faster and offers superior high ISO performance whilst the 5D Mark II will give you much greater resolution in addition to the video features. At the end of the day though, both cameras are not wildly different: ISO performance in the Canon is excellent and doesn't stop images appearing in
Vogue, whilst you'd be hard pressed to print to the upper limits of the D700.
*shrugs*