Trump..... (The Sophistry Thread)

I told you to bring it!



obama-866x488.jpg





chyeeeeaaaahhh!
 
That's exactly what I said as a response to the statement about developed nations. I'm more a picnic bringer.
 
Demanding an investigation onto if he was surveilled during the campaign.

IF he was, it would have been authorised, and they will only authorise if there is REALLY strong evidence to support its necessity.

The only thing that this can do, is bring to light more reasons they felt it necessary to do so, IF they did.
 
No, it’s partly because she was paid out of campaign funds, and specifically to hush her at a particular time that would have very damaging.
Trump HAS to admit that ‘David Dennison’ in the NDA is him, otherwise he can’t stop Stormy publicity releasing her pics and info...but when he does admit it, he will open right up the can of worms about lying, paying her off, having the affair, and disclosing how it was paid.
Meuller has all he needs on this, but Trump is having his hand forced.
I’m just parroting a really smart guy (lawyer) named Andrew Torres. Look up his podcast “opening arguments”, specifically, “stormy Daniels is a legal genius’ episode.

were they actually campaign funds or this is something people are insinuating to try and get him impeached?

I just don't see the big deal about it all and I don't think it has been proven he used campaign funds, he could have used his own personal money
 
Or his attorney may have paid it may have paid it for him from Cohen's own money. Cohen may have paid it using money from anonymous parties, like other governments or business leaders. Cohen may or may not have acted under instruction from Trump...it is all unknown for certain, thus the curiosity and potential big issue.
 
were they actually campaign funds or this is something people are insinuating to try and get him impeached?

I just don't see the big deal about it all and I don't think it has been proven he used campaign funds, he could have used his own personal money
Trump doesn’t use his personal money for ANYTHING...
 
Trump doesn’t use his personal money for ANYTHING...

That's your assumption and as far as i am aware, i don't believe there's any proof trump has used campaign funds to pay off the porn start and at the moment it mostly seems to be a he said she said claim.
 
Johnny I was referring to developed countries thought of fat , content reasonably ,wealthy and some respect for rationality and the law.
Virtually every poor , strongly religious country , badly colonized country has had a civil war.
 
Whilst most of those countries actually are developed, I was more just geeking out than arguing any particular point. My musings wre actually about the difference between an insurgency and civil war. If the insurgents are from the country they attack, Thailand, Malaysia, Venezuel and Pakistan, for example, is that a civil war?

Again, not directly in relation to the point that you were making, just a it of geopolitico-security geekery.
 
Again, not directly in relation to the point that you were making, just a it of geopolitico-security geekery.

Since when did Katter give a stuff about geo-whatchamacallit?



Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
 
That's your assumption and as far as i am aware, i don't believe there's any proof trump has used campaign funds to pay off the porn start and at the moment it mostly seems to be a he said she said claim.

It doesn’t have to have been campaign funds anyway. Paying her to keep quiet on the eve of his debate with Hillary, with the express purpose of effecting the outcome (or preventing another outcome), is itself an offence. Giuliani has already publicly admitted that it would have been disastrous if the affair had come out at that particular time.

And no, it’s not just my assumption. ‘Not yet proven guilty’ isn’t the same as innocent.
 
Since when did Katter give a stuff about geo-whatchamacallit?



Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
His electorate is the size of Iraq, Syria and Jordan combined, I'm sure there's plenty of intrigue up there...
 
USA: We’re pulling out of Iran Nuclear Deal.
Iran: Sweet, we’re enriching uranium then.
USA: Holy fuck world! We need to impose historic sanctions on Iran to stop them enriching uranium!!!
 
USA: We’re pulling out of Iran Nuclear Deal.
Iran: Sweet, we’re enriching uranium then.
USA: Holy fuck world! We need to impose historic sanctions on Iran to stop them enriching uranium!!!

Progressive...
 
I think the issue is that he has walked away from a plan that had a lot of support from other countries. He has done so in a negative way (evil Iran vs good America, Obama was Satan, and so on) rather than engaging Iran in a mutually beneficial process. We have seen how successful the "my stick is bigger than your stick" approach doesn't work in the past and the few times collaborative efforts have been made the results have been slightly less disastrous. Specific to Iran progress was made during Clinton's second term when he had a bit of a turn around in his approach.
 
Are you implying the Iranian nuclear proliferation, weapons development, warmongering in Syria and Yemen, undermining of the UN's P5+1 deal, etc. should go unchecked?
Are you really at a point of hating Trump so much that you're going to support Iran's Nuclear Program to prove the point?
I hate what Trump is doing, it’s nothing personal. I hate that he is installing people like Bolton who are hell bent on starting a war with Iran. Trump himself has no idea. He’s appointing who he’s told to appoint, and doing what they tell him to.
And no, I don’t support Iran’s nuclear program. That’s my point. While the US was part of the deal, Iran were largely doing the right thing. Now they have no incentive to, as I understand it. Happy to be shown otherwise, but not if it’s just your opinion.
 
Back
Top