Did I suggest otherwise? I just pointed out they're not worse than oil production, and the impact is mitigated in the long term by being recyclable.What do you actually imagine batteries are "magically transformed" into being? They also are mined, transported, extracted and all the other bits you mention above. If you want to try to say something, compare apples with apples.
Battery production is very environmentally damaging. .
The combined cycle more closely reflects "real world" usage. People in the real world drive both in the city and on rural roads. You can't just poke your hand up for one cycle and pretend you have a better result.Citing a combined cycle hides the advantage in stop start traffic, and the disadvantage in sustained highway use.
I'd interested in comparing particulates, NOx and CO emissions though. In city and highway cycles.
So, seeing you know this, how about you give us some numbers.The very vast bulk of the energy consumed by a vehicle in its use - the production component is relativly minor.
I just showed you that a hybrid SUV has WORSE fuel consumption than my diesel SUV. Then you add the battery production on top of that. Making it much worse again.A one off battery hit vs a lifetime of oil consumption is a clear improvement.
No, just that its not significantly worse that an ICE car, which also has all of those things attributed to its manufactuer.So, seeing you know this, how about you give us some numbers.
How much energy is consumed in the production of a hybrid vehicle? Including:
- exploration
- mining
- vehicle testing
- raw materials transport
- energy
- battery production
- tyre production
- aluminium smelting and subsequent production.
You are telling us its minor - what are the numbers?
I just showed you that a hybrid SUV has WORSE fuel consumption than my diesel SUV. Then you add the battery production on top of that. Making it much worse again.
How do you possibly come out thinking that is a good thing? Or is it head in sand again?
Head in sand again.And no, as I tried to explain you did not show your diesel has better fuel consumption.
Solar during the dayHow are the rechargers powered?
The Tesla powerwall idea is that the powerwall (an attractive battery) is charged by solar during the daytime and dischagred later to your car.How are the rechargers powered?
Its good bait to the lefties....I'm starting to think you're not being ironic with the andrew bolt reference in your signature...
Yep, when we expect facts to back up the hollow platitudes, it does get hard for you to continue.Plus you like "baiting lefties" - I have been down this road before with trolls of your ilk, and have found it to be dull and predictable.
Mine is a D-L, that reduces the numbers somewhat. D-S weighs a decent amount more than mine.
CVT, the numbers I had come from Lexus website.Transmission is the biggest difference, CVT or manual? The DS vs DL is insignificant - 0.1 from memory but the DS is a closer match to the Lexus, though still not as luxurious.
Agreed, driving style and conditions make a bigger difference. This really isn't my argument, I have a V8 in the shed that won't get near either of those numbers, it's just that you were asking Haakon to come up with 'facts' when your own (or Lexus's) were not perfect either.CVT, the numbers I had come from Lexus website.
Here's a review of the Lexus, in real world driving they only achieved 8.1l/100km:
http://www.carsguide.com.au/car-reviews/lexus-rx-450h-review-10781
It always depends on location and driving style but I have had mine down to using 4.7l/100km in a decent drive. Lifetime average of mine so far is 6.9 but that includes towing a 1,700kg Jayco Swan Outback camper trailer for several thousand kilometres.