steve job's pancreas
Likes Dirt
so fuckstick attains deity status now ?
Yikes
Yikes
right onchopsticks you are WRONG.
The legal term we are dealing here is "Act of God". If a person cannot perform the stipulations of a contract due to circumstances out of their control, they have a basis that provides them a defence from having to perform their promise. It is a very basic legal concept which applies in situations where floods, earthquakes, fires or any event out of normal control render the performance of the contract impossible. It is fair to say that applies to the Mont weather conditions.
It is often the practice for people/companies to offer partial or full refunds in these situations - as they wish to keep good relations with their customers. They are NOT obligated to do so.
Do not carry on with the delusion that your whining and bitching about refunds brought this result about. They have just shown good faith to their customers. Props to SPE.
I can only assume they have been following the response to the Mont, hence the Receive a refund of 70 per cent of your entry fee. (The rest covers us for expenses incurred with the 2014 event) mentioned...Tathra enduro (another awesome event) has also just been canned because of the weather. I don't know whether those guys have just learnt from the SPE/Mont experience, but the approach is considerably different and would probably not leave alot of people whining:
http://www.rotorburn.com/forums/showthread.php?278032-Tathra-mtb-enduro-postponed-until-june-7-8
SC, unless you have sat down in the last little while and read through the legislation that relates to this, I wouldn't be assuming that you are correct - I am not going to argue the point here, that time has passed, but do encourage you to look into the legislated protections for consumers.chopsticks you are WRONG.
The legal term we are dealing here is "Act of God". If a person cannot perform the stipulations of a contract due to circumstances out of their control, they have a basis that provides them a defence from having to perform their promise. It is a very basic legal concept which applies in situations where floods, earthquakes, fires or any event out of normal control render the performance of the contract impossible. It is fair to say that applies to the Mont weather conditions.
It is often the practice for people/companies to offer partial or full refunds in these situations - as they wish to keep good relations with their customers. They are NOT obligated to do so.
Do not carry on with the delusion that your whining and bitching about refunds brought this result about. They have just shown good faith to their customers. Props to SPE.
Seems reasonable.I can only assume they have been following the response to the Mont, hence the Receive a refund of 70 per cent of your entry fee. (The rest covers us for expenses incurred with the 2014 event) mentioned...
more like they know The Good Wife, aka fuckstick is on the case.I can only assume they have been following the response to the Mont, hence the Receive a refund of 70 per cent of your entry fee. (The rest covers us for expenses incurred with the 2014 event) mentioned...
Seems reasonable.
Is anyone going to argue now that the above is a bad thing for mountain biking?
Unfortunately, all my assumptions about you are from this threadActually...as a matter of fact I will continue my fancy degree while working full time.... pays well and I fucking enjoy life
You dont know me mate, have you ridden with me? do you know me as a person?
how do you know I dont pick up any shovels? Because I dont mention it or take photos?
what have YOU done for the sport? how do I know you have picked up a shovel? lets not make assumptions when you don't know squat
another thing to mention.... Contributing to this forum with helpful advice is just as beneficial to this sport. So... what have you done? I haven't seen you on the trails. I haven't seen you pick up a shovel, nor have i seen you give advice (not saying you havent... I just havent seen it, so I'll make the assumption you haven't/don't)
All I see if you riding a 301 ...... but hey.. I'm only assuming
I agree, but it sounds like they can cover it if they are saying their expenses equate to 30% of the entry fees.Just hope it doesn't send them broke.
Its hard to say, but I imagine the time it took to plan the entire event would be many hundreds of hours. Surely those costs (which can vary depending on how much you charge yourself out for) should be covered. If they charge themselves at say $60/hour and work a 50 hour week trying to organise something, thats $3,000 already.Serious question because i just dont see the costs stacking up
Can someone enlighten me on what an event like this is worth to put on? People seem to be talking about this sending them broke so they must have some idea what its worth.....
3000 entries at $180 is $540,000. Are they really that expensive to run?
Serious question because i just dont see the costs stacking up
Can someone enlighten me on what an event like this is worth to put on? People seem to be talking about this sending them broke so they must have some idea what its worth.....
3000 entries at $180 is $540,000. Are they really that expensive to run?
not going to argue with Lyle either, as I have no legal knowledge in the matter, simply quoted me what fair trading told meSC, unless you have sat down in the last little while and read through the legislation that relates to this, I wouldn't be assuming that you are correct - I am not going to argue the point here, that time has passed, but do encourage you to look into the legislated protections for consumers.
Fair Enough DeBloot, I respect a well written response that doesn't resort to name calling.It's about your demeanor in this thread which I find smug and self righteous
And you seem to be singled out for that reason whereby those that have agreed with you haven't
I'm sure you will read something self serving into that fact, as that is what you have done throughout this thread
I'm genuinely sorry, because you have a reasonably high profile and offer good advice
And I've deleted all my previous negative comments because of my previous thoughts about you
But you continued to act in your 'smug worm' manner which JD mentioned and I think a lot of us agree with
You just kept getting under my skin until i couldn't help but comment
Yes - what do i know - you could well be a great guy
But it sure as shit hasn't come across in this thread
Like really, it's not like your fighting for the underdog or the greater good of humanity here
For them to say 30% covers event expenses just shoes how much of a killing can/has be made in such eventsI can only assume they have been following the response to the Mont, hence the Receive a refund of 70 per cent of your entry fee. (The rest covers us for expenses incurred with the 2014 event) mentioned...
For them to say 30% covers event expenses just shoes how much of a killing can/has be made in such events
70% is ALOT ! And as a business... Good on them for making money!
The Tathra is a club run event? I think this differs to the SPE which would no doubt have higher costs involved when running the mont (showers, the tent city, etc). As to how much those costs are, noone knows for sure, but we clearly know your thoughts on this matter.
Second that motion Haak.I hope they cope financially.
SPE - if you're listening, there a lot of locals who love and appreciate all the trails. I for one will making sure I get to a track building day to help out, the very least I can do.
You've gone way above and beyond here, and it's a shame you had to cop so much.
Disclosure: I am not racing or involved with SPE or any other cycling association (despite what my blurb says). I do live in Canberra and do ride these trails occasionally (for free).Serious question because i just dont see the costs stacking up
Can someone enlighten me on what an event like this is worth to put on? People seem to be talking about this sending them broke so they must have some idea what its worth.....
3000 entries at $180 is $540,000. Are they really that expensive to run?