+1the swingarm's look similar but other than that there's barely resemblance to the trek.
The Norco is a Horst Link or FSR suspension design, the rear pivot is seatstay mounted.looks nice, and as has been said it does look like a trek.. but at the risk of coping some criticisim, isnt the shock mounted into the front triangle of the frame? That would make this essentially the same suspension design as the Kona Operator?
Pretty sure Kona is also a 4-bar style linkage, not a single pivot. You can clearly see another pivot on the rear triangle, above the rear axle.The Norco is a Horst Link or FSR suspension design, the rear pivot is seatstay mounted.
The Kona is a linkage activated single pivot, the rear pivot is chainstay mounted.
Hope this helps.
The placement of the rear axle in relation to the rear wheel determines the whether the suspension is FSR or a single pivot. The Kona Operator has the rear axle placement on the chain stays which is then connected directly to the mainframe. The seat stays and rocker linkage of the Kona Operator only serve to control the compression of the shock. It may be a four bar linkage, but it is still in effect a single pivot. The Norco Aurum has the rear axel connected to the seat stays, and is not directly connected to the mainframe.Pretty sure Kona is also a 4-bar style linkage, not a single pivot. You can clearly see another pivot on the rear triangle, above the rear axle.
Haha yeah I hope I helped. I'm no expert on suspension, I'll leave those shenanigans to S. and the other engineering geeks.Ah I see. Interesting. Half way through reading your reply I began to understand what you mean, the rear wheel path relative to the frame of a Kona bike is in effect the same path as a single pivot would have.
I stand corrected and thank you for enlightening me.
That's Canadian Dollars...it looks like the price is around $5350 just a guess as you can see what looks to be a price tag in the first picture