You dont find it ridiculous that it is now an offense simply jump on a bike to go a couple of quiet blocks to school to pick up my kid without id? An activity that requires no licence and for which there is no evidence where lack of id is in any way a significant issue?
Take a look at the round table members who supported this. The AGF headed by a liberal party staffer and harold scruby, a pedestrian advocate who himself mowed down pedestrians. Hardly good company that duncan keeps there. Even the government body who supposedly backs this admits there is 0 evidence for any of these changes.
Add to the other attacks on cyclists by Duncan and anyone on any form of bike who does not actively oppose this is irresponsible in my opinion.
Yep, i do, but i also believe that road cyclists have made a rod for their own back in a way, not that they are wholly responsible, but the behaviour of a small minority has upset plenty and someone has seen political gain to be had. It's the world we live in, laws cater for the lowest common denominator, always have, we can be outraged and incensed but at the end of the day i doubt coppers are rubbing their hands together at their local donut shop saying "we're gonna nail these cycling fuckers now!"and really, there's one law that supersedes all others when it comes to interacting with the police, it's called "failing to follow a police directive" or some such nonsense, it's their "i'm the law and what i say goes" law, and there's no argument for that.
Also worth noting that almost no one rides without a phone these days, it has strava on it after all, and there's 50 times more personal information to be had from that, including GPS tracking on everywhere you go.