You are wrong about the Oceanias thing too. The selection criteria actually states that results in major international events will be considered and specifically omits the Oceanias. It does however include a 'National Champion' clause.
Not quite right (but also not quite wrong... see a pattern of inconsistency forming?)
2.1 States that the committee will only consider results outside of Australia that are UCI registered or those mentioned in 2.4. But, note here, the actual clause is not saying they will only consider offshore events, simply that if the result is offshore it has to be a UCI event or one under 2.4. I even had my reading of this paragragh double checked - it is just not really well written, but it is clear enough to be understood.
In 2.2 we have a contradiction - it states that the cut off is 17 July (11.1 says 9 July) and then we get down to 2.4 and find an event listed that is not even taking place until 21 - 27 July (Crankworx)... we are only up to page two and already things are looking pretty wobbly.
2.3.1 is quite clear - the selection committee can consider podiums. As there has been and is nothing to suggest that these podiums are specific to 'outside Australia' events, provided the event is a Major UCI meet (as per Para 11.1) it can be considered
Para 11.1 is where all the problems really come from, and it is this paragraph that an athlete could appeal on if they were only racing here. It states that a rider must display their ability at an elite international level by attending a minimum of two UCI major races - it then goes on to list these races, but the problem is the way it is written is done more so as a way of providing examples rather than a restrictive list.
This means - and I will be as clear as possible for the cheap seats - that the Oceanias and Nationals would and should be considered as events that can be used as qualifying standards. The Nationals in particular had stronger field than any NORBA I have seen this year and craps on some of the events listed in the guide.
Likewise the Oceania's MUST be considered a major UCI race, because the UCI considers them a major event (rightly or wrongly). We actually have no choice in arguing this toss with them, regardless of who does and doesn't ride.
My biggest gripe is the event list is dodgy:
World Cup - No Probs there.
NORBA - OK, on a good non-clash day you'll get a good field, but most of the Rounds carry no UCI points.
Swiss Cup... Jesus - Are they kidding me!?
French Cup... No 4X and the points are worth less than our National Championships , so why are they listed?
Sorry to get technical above - but having just written the appeal for Strommy, I have been jumping all over this stuff for hours.
It may sound like I want the criteria relaxed - I don't. Actually I want criteria that are tougher and would make it almost impossible to appeal because it would be crystal clear. We are a long way from this yet.