Calvin27
Eats Squid
I thought we'd moved on fro mthe language of 'sceptic' and graduated to 'denier'.No no, I noted your qualification Just a general comment about "sceptics" at large.
I thought we'd moved on fro mthe language of 'sceptic' and graduated to 'denier'.No no, I noted your qualification Just a general comment about "sceptics" at large.
Hence the inverted commas. I personally prefer “morally bankrupt cnuts”.I thought we'd moved on fro mthe language of 'sceptic' and graduated to 'denier'.
Yes.I'd agree most offsets on the market today are 100% complete bulldust. But real offsets can exist. I would classify re plantation as a form of positive offset. I'd stick sequestration in there as well (still unsure of input/output though). However the point I think you are making is these opportunities are a drop in the ocean and limited in nature.
I work in the aviation fuel industry, Your head would spin clean off your shoulders if you knew how much fuel the military use for exercises and trainingI'd agree most offsets on the market today are 100% complete bulldust. But real offsets can exist. I would classify re plantation as a form of positive offset. I'd stick sequestration in there as well (still unsure of input/output though). However the point I think you are making is these opportunities are a drop in the ocean and limited in nature.
Same as above. I'd have to look at input/output costs but my observation is it can be done. The bigger problem is you can't grow enough to supply the whole sector. We have to cut air travel to make it work.
Correction. There’s no nuts around these c’s.“morally bankrupt cunts”.
How much of this usage is essential. Sweet fuck all. Here’s the thing, people didn’t fly around the world on whim. People mostly don’t need to fly around the world at a whim.And latest post:
World Energy Consumption – World Energy Data
www.worldenergydata.org
Electricity energy generation by method:
Woo!!! Solar panels will save the day!
And check out this graph - world total energy consumption by method:
Can you see how even total CO2 neutrality of the electricity sector will barely make a dent on CO2 emissions?
Somehow we need to drive all methods to CO2 neutrality in a decade.
I feel sorry for the children. I really do...
How deep do you want to go with this, people didn't used to drive cars, people don't mostly need to drive cars, is there a justification for owning a car?How much of this usage is essential. Sweet fuck all. Here’s the thing, people didn’t fly around the world on whim. People mostly don’t need to fly around the world at a whim.
I’ll lay down a challenge for justification for flying anywhere, apart from saving a life, or seeing someone near to you on their death bed, is there a justification?
Really deep. Like the future of life in the planet depended on it.How deep do you want to go with this, people didn't used to drive cars, people don't mostly need to drive cars, is there a justification for owning a car?
Might be a bit tricky, global economy would pretty much stop and most of us would be out of a job. Drawing the line is a difficult thing!Really deep. Like the future of life in the planet depended on it.
Lifes essentials
Might also add ability for some to reproduce.
- Food
- Water
- Shelter (variable, dependent on location and time of year)
That is pretty much it.
If we’re talking about cutting down to essentials then anything above survival is a luxury.Might be a bit tricky, global economy would pretty much stop and most of us would be out of a job. Drawing the line is a difficult thing!
I don't mean to nit pick because I know that we are of similar minds but the planet doesn't care and it will carry on regardless... most probably and more so preferably without us. I sadly believe that humanity will be/already is responsible for the next global extinction event and it would be egotistical to think that any individual action/s can prevent that, we can't even achieve a consensus on simple things like the shape of the earth let alone implement effective climate change policy, can you imagine trying to convince almost eight billion people that all they need is basic water, food and shelter without a catastrophic event to force our hands.Really deep. Like the future of life in the planet depended on it.
Lifes essentials
Might also add ability for some to reproduce.
- Food
- Water
- Shelter (variable, dependent on location and time of year)
That is pretty much it.
Mate, I am buying what you’re selling. I think the more the human race does to combat the concentration of co2 in the atmosphere the longer we’ll be around. We’ve doomed a shitload of species. We shouldn’t expect a different outcome. We’re not that special, especially so if what we do devolves the condition we depend on.I don't mean to nit pick because I know that we are of similar minds but the planet doesn't care and it will carry on regardless... most probably and more so preferably without us. I sadly believe that humanity will be/already is responsible for the next global extinction event and it would be egotistical to think that any individual action/s can prevent that, we can't even achieve a consensus on simple things like the shape of the earth let alone implement effective climate change policy, can you imagine trying to convince almost eight billion people that all they need is basic water, food and shelter without a catastrophic event to force our hands.