I want to know wheter people had an advantage riding XC bikes.
Why? you wasn't planning on attending anyway and if I remember correctly don't care.
But anyhoo, DH bikes were definitely an advantage,
But we need to get better tracks....
No one is arguing that.
For the record Squid did come up with a set of standards he wanted for the state races. Unfortunately a few of the original venues fell through.
It's ironic Xc has plenty of great venues and no riders while we have plenty of riders but are struggling for the venues/hosting club.
As I said before Lithgow was not in the original line up this year. When we were ask to fill in for another venue we still had the state mine. When we lost that I agonised over whether or not to run the twin tracks.
In the end it was race there or drop the round altogether and while it may not have been the best test for the Eilte riders it was a good way to introduce younger (and older) riders to the scene.
I think in theory we'd all like to see 5 tracks that truly tested the elite, but at the end of the day elite make up 40 riders out of the 230+ the rounds have been attracting. Is it so bad to aim 1 or 2 rounds at the general riders?