So - to summarise this thread (which is becoming more ridiculous by the minute), whats being said is that...
1/. Quality cant be assured, some examples of bad finish and QC have been experienced however
2/. Warranty doesnt matter
3/. Overall failure rate 'may not' be any different to a big name brand
4/. Big name brands would fight in court if you tried to prove frame failure resulted in injury.
5/. Personal liability (me badly building wheels) is the same as something being built and sold as 'fit for purpose'.
6/. If a pimply kid bled my brakes and did it wrong, I would have no come-back to said pimply kid.
Seriously, you want one of these frames, just go an f#cking buy one. Then show us how it goes.
It would seem that any of the normal criteria of bike buying (see above list) go out of the window.It also seems that any disagreement or negative advice or feedback will be met with intransigence. If they're that good - go get one.
Having worked with a very famous bike brand, that gets their carbon frames made in China, I know exactly how the factories work. I also know the truth behind the BS that says "brand X is made in the same factory as brand Y, so they are the same other than paint". Its nonsense. Manufacturers buy 'time' in factories. at the switch-over between brands, tools change, moulds change, tolerances change, even the labour force changes. It is exactly the same lighting, electricity, and even building address. The product is different.
I baked a cake last night, so did my missus. In the same kitchen, with the same ingredients. Mine was shit.
I didnt die at 40kph saving a cuppla hundred bucks though.