I tested out a potential new bike candidate this morning...
Liteville 301 140mm travel bike
This morning I was able to test a bike I've been considering as an upgrade from the Pivot Mach 5 I currently use as my XC bike. I'm soft and need lots of travel! So no hardtail or 100mm dually for me.
Set up was easy. A medium frame with a 75mm stem worked out to be the same length as my Mach 5 with the 90mm stem I have been running for the past year or so. Suspension set up really couldn't get any easier. The rocker arms have their own built in sag meter, two pins that match up when the sag is correct. 150mm forks, the same as my Mach 5. Sitting on the bike felt very natural straight away. Doing the carpark lift test the 301 felt considerably lighter than my M5 and I thought build quality of the frame was as good as the M5, but I would not say better.
Then we were off and riding. I was testing it at Appin, a track I'm very familiar with so I was able to compare how the 301 compared to the M5 over different sections. After the first bit of singletrack I let some air out of the rear tyre then afetr the first climb I increased the rear sag slightly. From here on it felt spot on. Not too firm and not too soft.
Into the next bit of singletrack with some sweeping turns and the 301 had the edge over the M5. It felt very nice through those turns around the top of Appin. Around the right hander that signals the end of the slightly downhill, faster turns and into the slight uphill stuff the rear end didn't have the same liveliness that the M5 had and this lack of feeling continued for the rest of my test. Over some of the more technical, square edged stuff I did notice the rear end hanging up a little, but it was significantly better than any other Horst Link bike I've ridden and it's always been a sensation I've been sensitive to because I don't like it. But on the 301 it didn't really detract from the ride that much, I could just feel it, and it's something my Pivots don't do and my old Nomad didn't either. I would say coming from my old FSR bike to the Nomad the improved compliance over square edged stuff was the single biggest improvement.
Riding down the singletrack towards the roll down/bridge the bike felt very stable. It is a stiff frame. I've never thought the M5 was flexy, but the 301 definitely felt stiffer to me. It also pops into the air easier than the M5. Standing up this bike has the least bob of any Horst Link bike I've ridden as well. That includes the good old Specialized Epic with that stupid Brain shock that hardly moves. Technical climbing it was very good, but again, it had that dead feeling. Coming down the techy stuff towards Kings Falls Bridge the 301 didn't feel as nice as the M5. Some of that could have been the rebound adjustment on the DT rear shock, but it had felt fine around everything else.
At the end of the test it was that dead feeling that did it for me. Despite being lighter than the M5 I didn't feel the 301 really inspired me to go fast. I would say it is much more of an AM bike where I want a more lively feeling XC type ride like the Mach 5. I feel the 301 would be a better replacement for my Pivot Firebird than the Mach 5 in the way it rides, but it's definitely not something I'll be doing. After all that, it is a very nice bike, and if I was going to buy a Horst Link bike this would be at the top of my list with a Knolly. But as it is, I think I'll be getting the Pivot Mach 5.7.