pink poodle
気が狂っている男
So sadSAD!
So sadSAD!
You're not nearly cynical enough. 1.5 degrees is a fantasy. Current trajectory is more like 3-4.From that article:
See, too little, too late. Plus, bet it doesn't happen. Commerce playing the game.
Gee I'm cynical. Gee I'm right.
Run the numbers of the CO2 burp in manufacturing the batteries for these?On the topic of low-emissions technology, here is a really interesting technology development - short range commercial e-aircraft are starting to come to market. Battery technology is going to weigh it down for a while though.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywis...nger-airplane-placed-by-massachusetts-carrier
It's not but if you can show an increasing or decreasing trend then we can evaluate the effectiveness of our actions.
There are many good emissions accounting publications available online, including on the environment departments website and the UNFCCC.
All signatories to the UNFCCC are required to provide an inventory of emissions over time, Australia included. All publicly available
This website has a nice graphical interface showing overall emissions and per capita emissions for each year from 1960 to 2017Drifting off topic, moving this one to the PB,CC,RE discussion.
The Coalition is counting a 367 megatonne abatement from carry-over credits(an accounting system that allows countries to count carbon credits from exceeding their targets under the soon-to-be-obsolete Kyoto protocol periods against their Paris commitment for 2030) to help meet Australia’s 2030 target.
Australia’s carbon budget also factors in emissions reduction from the Snowy Hydro expansion; energy efficiency measures; an electric vehicle strategy that the government has not yet unveiled; pollution reduction from the rebadged emissions reduction fund and just under 100Mt of abatement from “technology solutions” which aren’t specified and “other sources of abatement” such as projects under development but not yet contracted.
There was a French porn video actually made at the bottom of Uluru3 inches? Could be worth it...
Not saying that burning coal is good but actually seen a report from an engineer that worked in a New Castle Power station saying that the power station is actually more efficient than what a lot state.These guys crack me up...
Sent from my LG-H870DS using Tapatalk
lol. By how much? #lowtarcigarettesNot saying that burning coal is good but actually seen a report from an engineer that worked in a New Castle Power station saying that the power station is actually more efficient than what a lot state.
#csg #lng #stillburningshitlol. By how much? #lowtarcigarettes
I'm not a power station engineer but you challenge him if you want, I'v got better things to worry about at the moment.lol. By how much? #lowtarcigarettes
If it involves facebook i'll pass... Just saying even the best in the world is still burning coal - a "high efficiency" coal plant is only efficient in relative terms and is still utterly shit on all other measures.I'm not a power station engineer but you challenge him if you want, I'v got better things to worry about at the moment.
https://www.facebook.com/Burnsidesays/photos/a.451981158168227/2557839730915682/?type=3&theater
Your mate is full of shit. Obviously from the Murdoch School of Energy Production.I'm not a power station engineer but you challenge him if you want, I'v got better things to worry about at the moment.
https://www.facebook.com/Burnsidesays/photos/a.451981158168227/2557839730915682/?type=3&theater
Seems he's involved in the Galileo Movement, climate science deniers who are Malcolm Roberts' main source of facts.I'm not a power station engineer but you challenge him if you want,
Oh wow, just read the Facebook link. Utter fuckwit.Your mate is full of shit. Obviously from the Murdoch School of Energy Production.